본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).

🦱 탈모 🔵 RCT
무작위 임상시험 4/5 보강
BJU international 📖 저널 OA 29.7% 2021: 0/6 OA 2022: 3/7 OA 2023: 5/35 OA 2024: 1/54 OA 2025: 65/114 OA 2026: 58/101 OA 2021~2026 2004 Vol.93(7) p. 991-5 cited 150 RCR 3.09 Urinary Bladder and Prostate Researc
TL;DR To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis, National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS compared with placebo is studied.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-05-12
연도별 인용 (2012–2025) · 합계 66
OpenAlex 토픽 · Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research Sexual function and dysfunction studies Pelvic floor disorders treatments

Nickel JC, Downey J, Pontari MA, Shoskes DA, Zeitlin SI

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis, National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CP

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA J. Curtis Nickel, Jennifer N. Downey, et al. (2004). A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).. BJU international, 93(7), 991-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04766.x
MLA J. Curtis Nickel, et al.. "A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).." BJU international, vol. 93, no. 7, 2004, pp. 991-5.
PMID 15142149 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS) compared with placebo.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Men (76) with category IIIA CPPS enrolled in four North American prostatitis research centres were randomized after a 2-week placebo run-in to finasteride or placebo for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was a subjective overall assessment (SOA); the secondary efficacy variables included the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and safety data. Patients were assessed at screening, baseline (after the 2-week placebo run-in), 3 and 6 months.

[RESULTS] Sixty-four patients had at least one assessment on medication (31 placebo, 33 finasteride); 75% of the finasteride and 54% of the placebo group had at least a mild improvement (defined as > 25% improvement in SOA), and 44% and 27%, respectively, a moderate or marked improvement (>50% improvement in SOA). The trend was similar in the NIH-CPSI scores. Five patients in the finasteride and seven in the placebo group reported medication-related adverse events.

[CONCLUSION] This randomized placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that finasteride was of benefit for some men with category IIIA CPPS, but the results do not justify recommending finasteride as monotherapy, except for men who also have benign prostatic hyperplasia. A larger, properly powered study, possibly evaluating combination with other therapies or specifically in men with prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia, is required to confirm any clinical benefit.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반