A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).
🦱 탈모
🔵 RCT
무작위 임상시험
4/5 보강
TL;DR
To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis, National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS compared with placebo is studied.
연도별 인용 (2012–2025) · 합계 66
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis, National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CP
APA
J. Curtis Nickel, Jennifer N. Downey, et al. (2004). A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).. BJU international, 93(7), 991-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04766.x
MLA
J. Curtis Nickel, et al.. "A randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of finasteride for male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category IIIA chronic nonbacterial prostatitis).." BJU international, vol. 93, no. 7, 2004, pp. 991-5.
PMID
15142149 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] To determine if finasteride can reduce symptoms in men with a clinical diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis (National Institutes of Health, NIH, category IIIA chronic pelvic pain syndrome, CPPS) compared with placebo.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Men (76) with category IIIA CPPS enrolled in four North American prostatitis research centres were randomized after a 2-week placebo run-in to finasteride or placebo for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was a subjective overall assessment (SOA); the secondary efficacy variables included the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and safety data. Patients were assessed at screening, baseline (after the 2-week placebo run-in), 3 and 6 months.
[RESULTS] Sixty-four patients had at least one assessment on medication (31 placebo, 33 finasteride); 75% of the finasteride and 54% of the placebo group had at least a mild improvement (defined as > 25% improvement in SOA), and 44% and 27%, respectively, a moderate or marked improvement (>50% improvement in SOA). The trend was similar in the NIH-CPSI scores. Five patients in the finasteride and seven in the placebo group reported medication-related adverse events.
[CONCLUSION] This randomized placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that finasteride was of benefit for some men with category IIIA CPPS, but the results do not justify recommending finasteride as monotherapy, except for men who also have benign prostatic hyperplasia. A larger, properly powered study, possibly evaluating combination with other therapies or specifically in men with prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia, is required to confirm any clinical benefit.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Men (76) with category IIIA CPPS enrolled in four North American prostatitis research centres were randomized after a 2-week placebo run-in to finasteride or placebo for 6 months. The primary efficacy variable was a subjective overall assessment (SOA); the secondary efficacy variables included the NIH chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) and safety data. Patients were assessed at screening, baseline (after the 2-week placebo run-in), 3 and 6 months.
[RESULTS] Sixty-four patients had at least one assessment on medication (31 placebo, 33 finasteride); 75% of the finasteride and 54% of the placebo group had at least a mild improvement (defined as > 25% improvement in SOA), and 44% and 27%, respectively, a moderate or marked improvement (>50% improvement in SOA). The trend was similar in the NIH-CPSI scores. Five patients in the finasteride and seven in the placebo group reported medication-related adverse events.
[CONCLUSION] This randomized placebo-controlled pilot study suggests that finasteride was of benefit for some men with category IIIA CPPS, but the results do not justify recommending finasteride as monotherapy, except for men who also have benign prostatic hyperplasia. A larger, properly powered study, possibly evaluating combination with other therapies or specifically in men with prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia, is required to confirm any clinical benefit.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Comparison of dutasteride and finasteride for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Enlarged Prostate International Comparator Study (EPICS).
- Efficacy and safety of finasteride therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a 2-year randomized controlled trial (the PROSPECT study). PROscar Safety Plus Efficacy Canadian Two year Study.
- Comparison of clinical trials with finasteride and dutasteride.
- Nocturnal Autonomic Nervous System Dynamics and Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorders.
- The challenge of ecological validity in temporomandibular disorders research.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- 피나스테리드가 전립선암 발생에 미치는 영향.
- COVID-19의 50가지 이상의 장기 후유증: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석.
- 양성 전립선 비대증의 임상적 진행에 대한 doxazosin, finasteride 및 병용 요법의 장기 효과.
- 양성 전립선 비대증 환자에서 finasteride의 효과. The Finasteride Study Group.
- 양성 전립선 비대증 남성에서 급성 요폐의 위험과 수술적 치료 필요성에 대한 finasteride의 효과. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group.
- 원형 탈모에 대한 전장유전체 연관성 연구는 선천면역과 적응면역 모두의 관여를 시사한다.