Predicting case difficulty in endodontic microsurgery using machine learning algorithms.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] The study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for case difficulty prediction in endodontic microsurgery, assisting clinicians in preoperative analysis.
[METHODS] The cone-beam computed tomographic images were collected from 261 patients with 341 teeth and used for radiographic examination and measurement. Through linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, four models were established according to different loss functions, including the L1-loss LR model, L2-loss LR model, SVR model and XGBoost model. Five-fold cross-validation was applied in model training and validation. Explained variance score (EVS), coefficient of determination (R), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE) and median absolute error (MedAE) were calculated to evaluate the prediction performance.
[RESULTS] The MAE, MSE and MedAE values of the XGBoost model were the lowest, which were 0.1010, 0.0391 and 0.0235, respectively. The EVS and R values of the XGBoost model were the highest, which were 0.7885 and 0.7967, respectively. The factors used to predict the case difficulty in endodontic microsurgery were ordered according to their relative importance, including lesion size, the distance between apex and adjacent important anatomical structures, root filling density, root apex diameter, root resorption, tooth type, tooth length, root filling length, root canal curvature and the number of root canals.
[CONCLUSIONS] The XGBoost model outperformed the LR and SVR models on all evaluation metrics, which can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis. The relative feature importance provides a reference to develop the scoring system for case difficulty assessment in endodontic microsurgery.
[CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE] Preoperative case assessment is a crucial step to identify potential risks and make referral decisions. Machine learning models for case difficulty prediction in endodontic microsurgery can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis efficiently and accurately.
[METHODS] The cone-beam computed tomographic images were collected from 261 patients with 341 teeth and used for radiographic examination and measurement. Through linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, four models were established according to different loss functions, including the L1-loss LR model, L2-loss LR model, SVR model and XGBoost model. Five-fold cross-validation was applied in model training and validation. Explained variance score (EVS), coefficient of determination (R), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE) and median absolute error (MedAE) were calculated to evaluate the prediction performance.
[RESULTS] The MAE, MSE and MedAE values of the XGBoost model were the lowest, which were 0.1010, 0.0391 and 0.0235, respectively. The EVS and R values of the XGBoost model were the highest, which were 0.7885 and 0.7967, respectively. The factors used to predict the case difficulty in endodontic microsurgery were ordered according to their relative importance, including lesion size, the distance between apex and adjacent important anatomical structures, root filling density, root apex diameter, root resorption, tooth type, tooth length, root filling length, root canal curvature and the number of root canals.
[CONCLUSIONS] The XGBoost model outperformed the LR and SVR models on all evaluation metrics, which can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis. The relative feature importance provides a reference to develop the scoring system for case difficulty assessment in endodontic microsurgery.
[CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE] Preoperative case assessment is a crucial step to identify potential risks and make referral decisions. Machine learning models for case difficulty prediction in endodontic microsurgery can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis efficiently and accurately.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 5 | |
| 해부 | teeth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Five-fold
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | tooth
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | root
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | of
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | EVS
→ Explained variance score
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | tooth
|
C0040426
Tooth structure
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Machine learning
|
C0376284
Machine Learning
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Microsurgery; Root Canal Therapy; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Algorithms
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.