Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2024 Vol.25(1) p. 297

Ota M, Motomiya M, Watanabe N, Shimoda K, Iwasaki N

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The efficacy and safety of perforator-based propeller flaps (PPF) versus free flaps (FF) in traumatic lower leg and foot reconstructions are debated. PPFs are perceived as simpler due to advantages like avoiding microsurgery, but concerns about complications, such as flap congestion and necrosis, persist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of PPF and FF in trauma-related distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction.

[METHODS] We retrospectively studied 38 flaps in 33 patients who underwent lower leg and foot soft tissue reconstruction due to trauma at our hospital from 2015 until 2022. Flap-related outcomes and complications were compared between the PPF group (18 flaps in 15 patients) and the FF group (20 flaps in 18 patients). These included complete and partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, delayed osteomyelitis, and the coverage failure rate, defined as the need for secondary flaps due to flap necrosis.

[RESULTS] The coverage failure rate was 22% in the PPF group and 5% in the FF group, with complete necrosis observed in 11% of the PPF group and 5% of the FF group, and partial necrosis in 39% of the PPF group and 10% of the FF group, indicating no significant difference between the two groups. However, venous congestion was significantly higher in 72% of the PPF group compared to 10% of the FF group. Four PPFs and one FF required FF reconstruction due to implant/fracture exposure from necrosis. Additionally, four PPFs developed delayed osteomyelitis post-healing, requiring reconstruction using free vascularized bone graft in three out of four cases.

[CONCLUSIONS] Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg defects can lead to reconstructive failure, exposing implants or fractures and potentially causing catastrophic outcomes like osteomyelitis, jeopardizing limb salvage. Surgeons should be cautious about deeming PPFs as straightforward and microsurgery-free procedures, given the increased complication rates compared to FFs in traumatic reconstruction.

[DATA ACCESS STATEMENT] The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 flap 피판재건술 dict 5
합병증 necrosis 괴사 dict 4
합병증 flap necrosis 괴사 dict 3
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 2
해부 soft tissue scispacy 1
해부 leg scispacy 1
해부 foot scispacy 1
해부 tissue scispacy 1
해부 limb scispacy 1
해부 FFs scispacy 1
합병증 perforator-based propeller flaps scispacy 1
합병증 perforator-based propeller scispacy 1
합병증 flaps scispacy 1
합병증 foot soft scispacy 1
약물 PPF → propeller flaps scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Flap necrosis in traumatic lower-leg scispacy 1
질환 traumatic C0332663
Traumatic
scispacy 1
질환 congestion C0700148
Congestion
scispacy 1
질환 venous congestion C0042484
Venous Engorgement
scispacy 1
질환 osteomyelitis C0029443
Osteomyelitis
scispacy 1
질환 traumatic lower-leg defects scispacy 1
질환 fractures C0016658
Fracture
scispacy 1
질환 PPFs scispacy 1
질환 trauma C0043251
Wounds and Injuries
scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 venous scispacy 1
기타 bone graft scispacy 1
기타 PPFs scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Leg; Retrospective Studies; Free Tissue Flaps; Hyperemia; Lower Extremity; Foot Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Postoperative Complications; Soft Tissue Injuries; Osteomyelitis; Necrosis; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문