본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.

World neurosurgery 2025 Vol.195() p. 123603 🌐 cited 2 🔓 OA Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and
OpenAlex 토픽 · Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research Meningioma and schwannoma management Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments

Sisti JA, Delgardo MW, Yoh N, Okolo OB, Upadhyayula PS, Pascual-Leone A, Paccione CR, Wang TJC, Sisti MB

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] This study updates the results of a facial nerve preservation approach to treating vestibular schwannomas at a single institution by a single surgeon using retrosigmoid craniectomy with m

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < 0.05
  • 추적기간 12 months

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Jonathan Sisti, Mychael Delgardo, et al. (2025). A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.. World neurosurgery, 195, 123603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123603
MLA Jonathan Sisti, et al.. "A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.." World neurosurgery, vol. 195, 2025, pp. 123603.
PMID 39755149

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] This study updates the results of a facial nerve preservation approach to treating vestibular schwannomas at a single institution by a single surgeon using retrosigmoid craniectomy with microsurgery (MS) and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over a 25-year interval.

[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed 751 patients between 1998 and 2023 and grouped them by intervention: MS only (Group 1, 217 patients), SRS only (Group 2, 447 patients), MS then SRS (Group 3, 72 patients), SRS then MS (Group 4, 10 patients), and SRS then SRS (Group 5, 5 patients). The primary outcome variable was facial nerve function, defined as House-Brackmann grade ≤2 at last follow-up.

[RESULTS] Good outcomes by group were achieved in 98.2%, 99.6%, 93.1%, 90%, and 100% of patients, respectively. Upfront SRS (Group 2) resulted in significantly better facial nerve outcomes than upfront MS (Groups 1 and 3, 289 patients) (96.9% and 99.4%, P < 0.05). Mean tumor maximum linear diameters were 3.2, 1.32, 3.23, 1.98, and 1.64 cm. Subtotal resection rates in Groups 1, 3, and 4, were 68.2%, 81.9%, and 80%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time among patients (minimum follow-up of 12 months) was 52 (26.75-88) months, with a maximum of 297 months (24.75 years). Overall, 98.1% of patients had a good facial nerve outcome with no operative mortality.

[CONCLUSIONS] For larger tumors, MS emphasizing facial nerve preservation over gross total resection followed by adjuvant SRS for any interval tumor regrowth yields excellent facial nerve outcomes and tumor control rates. For smaller tumors, upfront SRS achieves superior facial nerve preservation with MS and SRS both viable salvage options for treatment of tumor progression. This paradigm balances tumor control, facial nerve preservation, and low morbidity.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 1
합병증 Facial Nerve scispacy 1
합병증 vestibular schwannomas scispacy 1
약물 3.23 scispacy 1
질환 Vestibular Schwannoma C0027859
Acoustic Neuroma
scispacy 1
질환 vestibular schwannomas C0027859
Acoustic Neuroma
scispacy 1
질환 SRS → stereotactic radiosurgery C3846112
Radiosurgery, Stereotactic
scispacy 1
질환 tumor C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 tumors C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
기타 facial nerve scispacy 1
기타 Groups 1 scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Radiosurgery; Adult; Facial Nerve; Aged; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome; Facial Nerve Injuries; Young Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Organ Sparing Treatments; Craniotomy

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문