A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments
[BACKGROUND] This study updates the results of a facial nerve preservation approach to treating vestibular schwannomas at a single institution by a single surgeon using retrosigmoid craniectomy with m
- p-value P < 0.05
- 추적기간 12 months
APA
Jonathan Sisti, Mychael Delgardo, et al. (2025). A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.. World neurosurgery, 195, 123603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123603
MLA
Jonathan Sisti, et al.. "A 25-Year Update on the Facial Nerve Sparing Approach for Vestibular Schwannoma.." World neurosurgery, vol. 195, 2025, pp. 123603.
PMID
39755149
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] This study updates the results of a facial nerve preservation approach to treating vestibular schwannomas at a single institution by a single surgeon using retrosigmoid craniectomy with microsurgery (MS) and gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over a 25-year interval.
[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed 751 patients between 1998 and 2023 and grouped them by intervention: MS only (Group 1, 217 patients), SRS only (Group 2, 447 patients), MS then SRS (Group 3, 72 patients), SRS then MS (Group 4, 10 patients), and SRS then SRS (Group 5, 5 patients). The primary outcome variable was facial nerve function, defined as House-Brackmann grade ≤2 at last follow-up.
[RESULTS] Good outcomes by group were achieved in 98.2%, 99.6%, 93.1%, 90%, and 100% of patients, respectively. Upfront SRS (Group 2) resulted in significantly better facial nerve outcomes than upfront MS (Groups 1 and 3, 289 patients) (96.9% and 99.4%, P < 0.05). Mean tumor maximum linear diameters were 3.2, 1.32, 3.23, 1.98, and 1.64 cm. Subtotal resection rates in Groups 1, 3, and 4, were 68.2%, 81.9%, and 80%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time among patients (minimum follow-up of 12 months) was 52 (26.75-88) months, with a maximum of 297 months (24.75 years). Overall, 98.1% of patients had a good facial nerve outcome with no operative mortality.
[CONCLUSIONS] For larger tumors, MS emphasizing facial nerve preservation over gross total resection followed by adjuvant SRS for any interval tumor regrowth yields excellent facial nerve outcomes and tumor control rates. For smaller tumors, upfront SRS achieves superior facial nerve preservation with MS and SRS both viable salvage options for treatment of tumor progression. This paradigm balances tumor control, facial nerve preservation, and low morbidity.
[METHODS] We retrospectively reviewed 751 patients between 1998 and 2023 and grouped them by intervention: MS only (Group 1, 217 patients), SRS only (Group 2, 447 patients), MS then SRS (Group 3, 72 patients), SRS then MS (Group 4, 10 patients), and SRS then SRS (Group 5, 5 patients). The primary outcome variable was facial nerve function, defined as House-Brackmann grade ≤2 at last follow-up.
[RESULTS] Good outcomes by group were achieved in 98.2%, 99.6%, 93.1%, 90%, and 100% of patients, respectively. Upfront SRS (Group 2) resulted in significantly better facial nerve outcomes than upfront MS (Groups 1 and 3, 289 patients) (96.9% and 99.4%, P < 0.05). Mean tumor maximum linear diameters were 3.2, 1.32, 3.23, 1.98, and 1.64 cm. Subtotal resection rates in Groups 1, 3, and 4, were 68.2%, 81.9%, and 80%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time among patients (minimum follow-up of 12 months) was 52 (26.75-88) months, with a maximum of 297 months (24.75 years). Overall, 98.1% of patients had a good facial nerve outcome with no operative mortality.
[CONCLUSIONS] For larger tumors, MS emphasizing facial nerve preservation over gross total resection followed by adjuvant SRS for any interval tumor regrowth yields excellent facial nerve outcomes and tumor control rates. For smaller tumors, upfront SRS achieves superior facial nerve preservation with MS and SRS both viable salvage options for treatment of tumor progression. This paradigm balances tumor control, facial nerve preservation, and low morbidity.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | Facial Nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | vestibular schwannomas
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | 3.23
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Vestibular Schwannoma
|
C0027859
Acoustic Neuroma
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | vestibular schwannomas
|
C0027859
Acoustic Neuroma
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | SRS
→ stereotactic radiosurgery
|
C3846112
Radiosurgery, Stereotactic
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | tumor
|
C0027651
Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | tumors
|
C0027651
Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | facial nerve
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Groups 1
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Radiosurgery; Adult; Facial Nerve; Aged; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome; Facial Nerve Injuries; Young Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Organ Sparing Treatments; Craniotomy
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.