Single-Stage Latissimus-Implant Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Reliable: A Single Surgeon Series of 207 Flaps.

Annals of plastic surgery 2025 Vol.94(5S Suppl 3) p. S457-S464

Aref Y, Samaha Y, Almadani H, Mitchell B, Ray EC, Sherman R, Brazio PS

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) is a historical workhorse and contemporary salvage mainstay for breast reconstruction. There is still debate regarding timing and staging, with some authors advocating for staged reconstruction using tissue expanders. We present a single-surgeon experience with LDF breast reconstruction and compare the results of single-stage reconstruction versus staged approaches.

[METHODS] Patients undergoing LDF breast reconstruction from 2008 to 2021 with a single surgeon (R.S.) were included. Charts were reviewed for demographics, indications, number and type of planned stages, and outcomes. Acute and chronic complications and revisions were compared between indication and staging groups.

[RESULTS] A total of 156 patients underwent LDF breast reconstruction, of which 111 flaps (53.1%) were bilateral. One hundred seventy-nine (85.6%) flaps were for primary reconstruction, and 30 (14.4%) flaps were for salvage of a previous breast reconstruction. Fourteen (6.7%) flaps were 1-stage LDF alone, 189 (90.4%) were 1-stage LDF with implant, 1 (0.5%) was 2-stage LDF with implant, and 5 (2.4%) were 2-stage LDF with tissue expander then implant. The mean follow-up was 44.9 months (range, 1-164 months). The most common complication was capsular contracture (29%). Overall complication rates were similar between primary and salvage reconstruction (35.8% vs 43.3%, P = 0.426), as was needed for revision (39.1% vs 40.0%, P = 0.926). There was a significant difference in complication rate (P = 0.021) but not revision rate (P = 0.133) between staging groups: 1-stage LDF alone, 7.1%, 14.3%; 1-stage LDF with implant, 40.2%, 41.8%; 2-stage LDF with implant, 0.0%, 0.0%; and 2-stage LDF with expander then implant, 0.0%, 20.0%. After removing capsular contracture, there was no difference in complication rates.

[CONCLUSIONS] Single-staged LDF/implant reconstruction remains a safe and reliable surgical option for both primary and salvage breast reconstruction. High rates of capsular contracture should prompt the deployment of techniques to reduce its incidence.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 7
합병증 capsular contracture 피막구축 dict 3
시술 latissimus dorsi flap 피판재건술 dict 1
합병증 LDF breast scispacy 1
약물 seventy-nine C3828184
Seventy Nine
scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] The scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Single-staged LDF/implant scispacy 1
질환 primary and salvage breast scispacy 1
질환 contracture C0009917
Contracture
scispacy 1
기타 tissue expanders scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 tissue expander scispacy 1
기타 capsular scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Superficial Back Muscles; Mammaplasty; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Flaps; Breast Implants; Treatment Outcome; Mastectomy; Aged; Postoperative Complications; Breast Neoplasms; Breast Implantation; Reoperation

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문