The impact of resection margins in hypopharyngeal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to frequently late-stage presentation and intrinsic anatomical complexity. Surgery remains a key treatment, and resection margins are crucial for local control and survival. However, achieving adequate margins is challenging due to submucosal tumour spread and common "skip lesions". This systematic review examines the impact of positive and close margins on oncological outcomes and their role in treatment planning.
[METHODS] Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).
[RESULTS] From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).
[CONCLUSIONS] This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.
[METHODS] Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).
[RESULTS] From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).
[CONCLUSIONS] This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | lesions
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | DSS HR
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE] Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | EMBASE
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기법 | robotic surgery
|
로봇수술 | dict | 1 | |
| 질환 | Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
|
C0280321
Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | aggressive malignancy
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | tumour
|
C0027651
Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | hypopharyngeal cancer
|
C0153398
Hypopharyngeal Cancer
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | DSS
→ disease-specific survival
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | hypopharyngeal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | malignancy
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | submucosal tumour
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | submucosal
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Margins of Excision; Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.