The impact of resection margins in hypopharyngeal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale 2025 Vol.45(Suppl. 1) p. S99-S108

Mattioli F, Succo G, Piazza F, Gillone C, Ferulli G, Alberti C, Del Giovane C, Sapino S, Pagliuca G, Molteni G, Crosetti E

관련 도메인

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis due to frequently late-stage presentation and intrinsic anatomical complexity. Surgery remains a key treatment, and resection margins are crucial for local control and survival. However, achieving adequate margins is challenging due to submucosal tumour spread and common "skip lesions". This systematic review examines the impact of positive and close margins on oncological outcomes and their role in treatment planning.

[METHODS] Following PRISMA guidelines, we included studies on adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open resections. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and local control. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, with eligible studies screened based on strict inclusion criteria. Random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).

[RESULTS] From an initial pool of 2,681 articles, 157 full-text studies were reviewed, and 7 met inclusion criteria. Data on 619 patients (mean age, 60.9 years) were analysed, all from retrospective studies. Among these, 17% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 94% underwent adjuvant treatment due to positive margins or other adverse features. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant impact of positive or close margins on OS, DSS, or DFS when compared to negative ones. OS had an HR of 1.78 (95%CI: 0.79-4.04, p = 0.17), DFS HR 1.43 (95%CI: 0.82-2.49, p = 0.21), and DSS HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.42-4.05, p = 0.42).

[CONCLUSIONS] This review underscores the challenges of achieving optimal margins in hypopharyngeal cancer surgery. While positive and close margins increase the risk of recurrence, their impact on survival remains unclear, emphasising the need for standardised margin assessment and tailored treatment strategies. The significant submucosal spread and presence of skip lesions necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Future research should refine surgical techniques, improve intraoperative margin assessment, and optimise adjuvant therapy protocols to enhance oncologic outcomes.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 microsurgery 미세수술 dict 1
합병증 lesions scispacy 1
약물 DSS HR scispacy 1
약물 [OBJECTIVE] Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma scispacy 1
약물 EMBASE scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
기법 robotic surgery 로봇수술 dict 1
질환 Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma C0280321
Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
scispacy 1
질환 aggressive malignancy scispacy 1
질환 tumour C0027651
Neoplasms
scispacy 1
질환 hypopharyngeal cancer C0153398
Hypopharyngeal Cancer
scispacy 1
질환 DSS → disease-specific survival scispacy 1
질환 hypopharyngeal scispacy 1
질환 malignancy scispacy 1
질환 submucosal tumour scispacy 1
질환 adult hypopharyngeal cancer patients scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 submucosal scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Margins of Excision; Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문