Risk of recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment in T2 rectal cancer.
TL;DR
TEM for T2 rectal cancer has high risk of local recurrence and cannot be recommended when intent is curative, but could be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
📈 연도별 인용 (2025–2026) · 합계 2
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
TEM for T2 rectal cancer has high risk of local recurrence and cannot be recommended when intent is curative, but could be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
- p-value p < 0.01
- HR 25.58
APA
Erik Wetterholm, Carl-Fredrik Rönnow, Henrik Thorlacius (2025). Risk of recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment in T2 rectal cancer.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 51(7), 109974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109974
MLA
Erik Wetterholm, et al.. "Risk of recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment in T2 rectal cancer.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 51, no. 7, 2025, pp. 109974.
PMID
40139119
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is only curative treatment for T1 rectal cancer with low-risk features. In T2 cancer, TEM is not recommended but could be used as a palliative procedure and/or in patients unfit for surgery. Few studies exist investigating recurrence after TEM for T2 rectal cancer.
[METHOD] Retrospective, population-based study using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Included patients had T2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with TEM or surgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy between 2009 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up, with syn/metachronous tumours or unknown recurrence status were excluded. Patient characteristics, perioperative morbidity, local and distant recurrence were compared.
[RESULTS] 63 patients treated with TEM and 894 with surgery. Median age was 81 and 70 (p < 0.01). 59 % and 23 % respectively were ASA III-IV (p < 0.01). TEM tumours were more distal, 37 % vs 16 % in the lower third of the rectum (p < 0.01). There were no severe complications after TEM compared to 6 % following surgery (p = 0.04). 5-year local recurrence was 33 % after TEM and 2 % after surgery (HR = 25.58, (p < 0.01). 5-year distant recurrence rate was 9 % after TEM and 7 % after surgery (HR = 0.49, (p = 0.27). Mean time to local recurrence was 16 months after TEM, 34 months after surgery, time to distant recurrence 22 months after both.
[CONCLUSION] TEM for T2 rectal cancer has high risk of local recurrence and cannot be recommended when intent is curative. TEM could be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
[METHOD] Retrospective, population-based study using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Included patients had T2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with TEM or surgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy between 2009 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up, with syn/metachronous tumours or unknown recurrence status were excluded. Patient characteristics, perioperative morbidity, local and distant recurrence were compared.
[RESULTS] 63 patients treated with TEM and 894 with surgery. Median age was 81 and 70 (p < 0.01). 59 % and 23 % respectively were ASA III-IV (p < 0.01). TEM tumours were more distal, 37 % vs 16 % in the lower third of the rectum (p < 0.01). There were no severe complications after TEM compared to 6 % following surgery (p = 0.04). 5-year local recurrence was 33 % after TEM and 2 % after surgery (HR = 25.58, (p < 0.01). 5-year distant recurrence rate was 9 % after TEM and 7 % after surgery (HR = 0.49, (p = 0.27). Mean time to local recurrence was 16 months after TEM, 34 months after surgery, time to distant recurrence 22 months after both.
[CONCLUSION] TEM for T2 rectal cancer has high risk of local recurrence and cannot be recommended when intent is curative. TEM could be an option for patients unfit for surgery.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 2 | |
| 기법 | endoscopic
|
내시경 | dict | 2 | |
| 약물 | [RESULTS] 63 patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cancer
|
C0006826
Malignant Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | T2 cancer
|
C0006826
Malignant Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Colorectal Cancer
|
C0009402
Colorectal Carcinoma
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | T2 rectal adenocarcinoma
|
C0149978
Adenocarcinoma of rectum
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | tumours
|
C0027651
Neoplasms
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | T2 rectal cancer
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | rectal cancer
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | rectum
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Male; Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery; Female; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Adenocarcinoma; Aged, 80 and over; Neoplasm Staging; Sweden; Middle Aged; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Registries
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.