Comparison between endoscopic resection and transanal surgery for treatment of rectal tumors: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND/AIMS] Both endoscopic resection (ER) and transanal surgery (TAS) are minimally invasive treatment options that allow organ preservation in early rectal tumors. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare treatment outcomes between the 2 treatments.
[METHODS] We searched all relevant studies published until January 2024 that examined the comparative outcomes between ER and TAS for rectal tumors, including adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET). TAS included transanal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transanal minimally invasive surgery.
[RESULTS] Seventeen studies with a total of 1,569 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For adenoma/adenocarcinoma, the R0 resection rate did not differ between ER and TAS (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.03). For NET, the R0 resection rate was lower in the ER group than in the TAS group (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84) and the procedure time for ER was shorter than that for TAS. For both adenoma/adenocarcinoma and NET, ER and TAS did not differ in terms of complication rates, additional surgery, and recurrence.
[CONCLUSIONS] ER and TAS showed similar treatment outcomes for adenoma/adenocarcinoma. Considering that TAS typically incurs higher costs than ER, ER may be favored in the treatment of rectal adenoma/adenocarcinoma. For rectal NET, TAS showed a superior R0 resection rate than ER. However, given that TAS requires a long procedure time, expensive equipment, and complex manipulations, TAS may be considered selectively for large NETs with suspected deep tumorous infiltration.
[METHODS] We searched all relevant studies published until January 2024 that examined the comparative outcomes between ER and TAS for rectal tumors, including adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET). TAS included transanal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transanal minimally invasive surgery.
[RESULTS] Seventeen studies with a total of 1,569 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For adenoma/adenocarcinoma, the R0 resection rate did not differ between ER and TAS (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.03). For NET, the R0 resection rate was lower in the ER group than in the TAS group (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84) and the procedure time for ER was shorter than that for TAS. For both adenoma/adenocarcinoma and NET, ER and TAS did not differ in terms of complication rates, additional surgery, and recurrence.
[CONCLUSIONS] ER and TAS showed similar treatment outcomes for adenoma/adenocarcinoma. Considering that TAS typically incurs higher costs than ER, ER may be favored in the treatment of rectal adenoma/adenocarcinoma. For rectal NET, TAS showed a superior R0 resection rate than ER. However, given that TAS requires a long procedure time, expensive equipment, and complex manipulations, TAS may be considered selectively for large NETs with suspected deep tumorous infiltration.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 기법 | endoscopic
|
내시경 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | microsurgery
|
미세수술 | dict | 1 |
📑 인용 관계
이 논문이 참조한 문헌 39
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Offers a Safer and More Cost-effective Alternative to Transan…
- Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery…
- Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the…
- Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for T1 rectal n…
- Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs).
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of early rect…
- Comparison among different techniques for en-bloc resection of rectal lesions: transanal endoscopic …
- Endoscopic management versus transanal surgery for early primary or early locally recurrent rectal n…
- Transanal minimally invasive surgery endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rect…
외부 PMID 30건 (DB 미수집)
- PMID 12958120 ↗
- PMID 19631507 ↗
- PMID 20174935 ↗
- PMID 20652370 ↗
- PMID 21160652 ↗
- PMID 21299616 ↗
- PMID 21789647 ↗
- PMID 22023493 ↗
- PMID 22821140 ↗
- PMID 23012217 ↗
- PMID 24366188 ↗
- PMID 24447261 ↗
- PMID 26448919 ↗
- PMID 26929754 ↗
- PMID 26990716 ↗
- PMID 27324379 ↗
- PMID 27377520 ↗
- PMID 28502883 ↗
- PMID 28659349 ↗
- PMID 29637919 ↗
- PMID 30077787 ↗
- PMID 30849517 ↗
- PMID 31566804 ↗
- PMID 33538338 ↗
- PMID 35523224 ↗
- PMID 35916019 ↗
- PMID 36751043 ↗
- PMID 37915180 ↗
- PMID 38295766 ↗
- PMID 38311713 ↗
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Endodontic implications of hypercementosis: A systematic review of anatomical challenges and therapeutic strategies.
- Breast plastic surgery in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: Menopause-informed counseling on screening, safety, and long-term breast health.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Free flap reconstruction of a cast-related pressure ulcer in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy.
- Characterization of Trimmed Nerve Morphology Using High-Resolution Imaging: Comparison of Three Surgical Instruments.