Attitudes, awareness, and usage of medical antiaging treatments: results of a patient survey.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] To explore factors important to patients considering medical antiaging treatments.
[DESIGN] Ten-minute online survey using a global opinion panel.
[SETTING] Survey of existing and prospective patients cosponsored by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery and Dermik Laboratories, a business of Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC.
[PARTICIPANTS] 383 women aged 35 to 69 years (mean, 52 years; 91% Caucasian) with an annual household income of at least $50,000, who were considering undergoing medical antiaging treatments within the next two years ("medical antiaging treatment considerers"). Of these, 100 had used an injectable product such as dermal fillers, collagen replacers, or muscle relaxants in the past two years ("injectable users"); a subset of 64 had specifically used an injectable dermal filler or collagen replacer in the past two years ("filler users").
[MEASUREMENTS] Maximum difference analysis of factors most important to respondents when considering medical antiaging treatments, safety, and potential for side effects.
[RESULTS] Medical antiaging treatment considerers, injectable users, and filler users all identified physician training and expertise as the most important factor (93-95% of respondents); other key factors included duration of effect, cost, how the product works, and recommendation by the physician. In paired comparisons, women were more interested in results that last a long time versus immediate results (89-91% of respondents), and gradual results that last for two years versus immediate results that last for six months (85-89% of respondents).
[CONCLUSION] Physician experience and training is very important to patients who are considering medical antiaging treatments, and should therefore be addressed during the counseling of prospective patients.
[DESIGN] Ten-minute online survey using a global opinion panel.
[SETTING] Survey of existing and prospective patients cosponsored by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery and Dermik Laboratories, a business of Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC.
[PARTICIPANTS] 383 women aged 35 to 69 years (mean, 52 years; 91% Caucasian) with an annual household income of at least $50,000, who were considering undergoing medical antiaging treatments within the next two years ("medical antiaging treatment considerers"). Of these, 100 had used an injectable product such as dermal fillers, collagen replacers, or muscle relaxants in the past two years ("injectable users"); a subset of 64 had specifically used an injectable dermal filler or collagen replacer in the past two years ("filler users").
[MEASUREMENTS] Maximum difference analysis of factors most important to respondents when considering medical antiaging treatments, safety, and potential for side effects.
[RESULTS] Medical antiaging treatment considerers, injectable users, and filler users all identified physician training and expertise as the most important factor (93-95% of respondents); other key factors included duration of effect, cost, how the product works, and recommendation by the physician. In paired comparisons, women were more interested in results that last a long time versus immediate results (89-91% of respondents), and gradual results that last for two years versus immediate results that last for six months (85-89% of respondents).
[CONCLUSION] Physician experience and training is very important to patients who are considering medical antiaging treatments, and should therefore be addressed during the counseling of prospective patients.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | dermal filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.