Efficacy and Safety of a New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Dynamic Perioral Rhytides: A 52-Week Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The perioral region is highly mobile and subject to multifactorial changes during aging. Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity (RHAR), an RHA filler, was developed with the aim of optimizing outcomes in dynamic facial areas.
[OBJECTIVE] This randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study aimed to demonstrate superiority of RHAR over no-treatment control for correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic perioral rhytides.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Blinded live evaluator assessments of efficacy included improvement in perioral rhytides severity using a proprietary scale (Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale [PR-SRS]) and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects self-assessed their results with FACE-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, and satisfaction scales. Safety was monitored throughout the study based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs).
[RESULTS] The primary efficacy end point was achieved, with the treatment group showing statistically significant superiority over the control group at Week 8 (80.7% vs 7.8% responder rate by PR-SRS, p < .0001). Most patients (66%) were still responders at Week 52 (study completion). Most AEs were CTRs after perioral injection of a dermal filler, and none was a clinically significant treatment-related AE.
[CONCLUSION] Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity is effective and safe for the correction of dynamic perioral rhytides in all Fitzpatrick phototypes, with marked durability.
[OBJECTIVE] This randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study aimed to demonstrate superiority of RHAR over no-treatment control for correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic perioral rhytides.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Blinded live evaluator assessments of efficacy included improvement in perioral rhytides severity using a proprietary scale (Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale [PR-SRS]) and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects self-assessed their results with FACE-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, and satisfaction scales. Safety was monitored throughout the study based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs).
[RESULTS] The primary efficacy end point was achieved, with the treatment group showing statistically significant superiority over the control group at Week 8 (80.7% vs 7.8% responder rate by PR-SRS, p < .0001). Most patients (66%) were still responders at Week 52 (study completion). Most AEs were CTRs after perioral injection of a dermal filler, and none was a clinically significant treatment-related AE.
[CONCLUSION] Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity is effective and safe for the correction of dynamic perioral rhytides in all Fitzpatrick phototypes, with marked durability.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 재료 | hyaluronic acid
|
히알루론산 | dict | 3 | |
| 시술 | hyaluronic acid filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 | |
| 시술 | dermal filler
|
필러 주입술 | dict | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Aged; Dermal Fillers; Female; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Patient Satisfaction; Prospective Studies; Rhytidoplasty; Skin Aging
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Penetrating globe injury following periocular hyaluronic acid filler injection: A case report.
- Choroidal ischemia after self-injection of hyaluronic acid filler.
- Intra-articular therapies for synovial joint dysfunction: a comprehensive integrative review.
- Clinical safety of a low-modification hyaluronic acid filler (MoD 2%) for facial rejuvenation.
- A Fibrous-Porous Microsphere-Based Composite Filler for Synchronized Immediate and Long-Term Soft Tissue Restoration.