본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars.

Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2022 Vol.21(9) p. 3768-3778

Siperstein R, Nestor E, Meran S, Grunebaum L

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo-controlled stu

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.008
  • p-value p = 0.004

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Siperstein R, Nestor E, et al. (2022). A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars.. Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 21(9), 3768-3778. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153
MLA Siperstein R, et al.. "A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars.." Journal of cosmetic dermatology, vol. 21, no. 9, 2022, pp. 3768-3778.
PMID 35689521
DOI 10.1111/jocd.15153

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo-controlled study.

[OBJECTIVE] To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars.

[METHODS & MATERIALS] Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC-17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch-up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo-analysis.

[RESULTS] According to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC-17.5L compared with saline (-6.6 VYC-17.5L vs -1.7 saline [t(28) = -4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = -3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC-17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30.

[CONCLUSION] VYC-17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
재료 hyaluronic acid 히알루론산 dict 3
시술 hyaluronic acid filler 필러 주입술 dict 2

MeSH Terms

Atrophy; Cicatrix; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Prospective Studies; Skin Aging; Treatment Outcome

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

관련 논문