본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Combined effect of botulinum toxin and splinting on motor components and function of people suffering a stroke.

Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2016 Vol.30() p. 373

Amini M, Shamili A, Frough B, Pashmdarfard M, Fallahzadeh Abarghouei A

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Spasticity is one of the problems after a stroke.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p=0.05
  • p-value p=0.007

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Amini M, Shamili A, et al. (2016). Combined effect of botulinum toxin and splinting on motor components and function of people suffering a stroke.. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 30, 373.
MLA Amini M, et al.. "Combined effect of botulinum toxin and splinting on motor components and function of people suffering a stroke.." Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 30, 2016, pp. 373.
PMID 27493917

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Spasticity is one of the problems after a stroke. Due to this increase in muscle tone, patients are confronted with problems in motor control and difficulties in activities of daily living and complications such as shortness and contracture. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the simultaneous use of both splint and botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) injection on spasticity, range of motion and upper extremity function in a 3-month period.

[METHODS] In this study a comparison was done between three groups of interventions, conducted in rehabilitation clinics in Tehran. Sixty people with chronic stroke were recruited. Based on the inclusion criteria, a total of 39 stroke patients after completing the consent forms were entered to intervention groups; splint or botulinum toxin injection or combined splint/botulinum toxin injection. They were followed up about three months and the evaluations were done monthly. Goniometry was the method to measure the range of motion, and Modified Ashworth Scale was used to examine the spasticity and the upper extremity function was scored based on Fugl- Meyer Assessment. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 17. And ANOVAs was used for comparison between groups and times. Significance was set at 0.05.

[RESULTS] All outcome measures were improved within each group but the differences between splint group and BTX-A group and the BTX-A-splint group was not significant in most outcomes during the 3 periods (first evaluation until end of the first month, the end of first month until the end of second month, the end of second month until the end of the third month) (p>0.05). The results also showed that the changes in elbow`s spasticity (p=0.05) and wrist`s spasticity (p=0.007) and upper extremity function (p=0.04) were obvious between the three groups over the 3-months and the difference in the group of combined use of botulinum toxin, and the splint was more than other groups.

[CONCLUSION] In this study, the effects of botulinum toxin injection and Volar-Dorsal Wrist/Hand Immobilization splint and the combined use of botulinum injection and splint were obvious in all groups but was not significantly different between the interventions in a 3-month follow-up.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 botulinum toxin 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 6

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

관련 논문