본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Placebo for Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Two-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2018 Vol.100(18) p. 1589-1596

Alvarez CM, Wright JG, Chhina H, Howren A, Law P

관련 도메인

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Alvarez CM, Wright JG, et al. (2018). Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Placebo for Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Two-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 100(18), 1589-1596. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01652
MLA Alvarez CM, et al.. "Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Placebo for Idiopathic Clubfoot: A Two-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.." The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 100, no. 18, 2018, pp. 1589-1596.
PMID 30234623

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Congenital idiopathic clubfoot is a condition that affects, on average, approximately 1 in 1,000 infants. One broadly adopted method of management, described by Ponseti, is the performance of a percutaneous complete tenotomy when hindfoot stall occurs. The use of onabotulinum toxin A (BTX-A) along with the manipulation and cast protocol described by Ponseti has been previously reported. Our goal was to compare the clinical outcomes between BTX-A and placebo injections into the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle at the time of hindfoot stall in infants with idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method of manipulation and cast changes.

[METHODS] This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with balanced randomization.

[RESULTS] At 6 weeks after the study injection (T1), 66% of the 32 feet in the BTX-A arm and 63% of the 30 in the placebo arm responded to the treatment (i.e., obtained ≥15° of dorsiflexion). Seven of the 11 patients in the BTX-A arm and all of the 11 in the placebo arm who had not responded at T1 responded to a rescue BTX-A injection at 12 weeks after the first injection (T2). The combined response rate at T2, which included the first-time responders as well as the patients who did not respond at T1 but did at T2, was 88% in the BTX-A arm and 100% in the placebo arm, culminating in a 94% response rate at T2. At T3 (2 years of age), 89% of the feet continued to respond and there was an 8% surgical rate.

[CONCLUSIONS] There was no difference in outcomes between the BTX-A and placebo groups when the injection was performed at the time of hindfoot stall. Overall, 92% of the clubfeet in this study responded to a manipulation and cast protocol alone, with or without BTX-A injection, by 12 weeks after hindfoot stall, or we can say that 92% of the clubfeet did not require percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening by 2 years of age. The need for tenotomy is limited to those who have not responded to treatment at this point, and the need for surgery is limited to those for whom all attempts at treatment with sequential casts, BTX-A, and percutaneous Achilles tendon lengthening have failed.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE] Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 botulinum toxin 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 1

MeSH Terms

Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Child, Preschool; Clubfoot; Combined Modality Therapy; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Manipulation, Orthopedic; Neuromuscular Agents; Placebos

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

관련 논문