[Migraine burden and clinical inertia: what can we do?].

Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova 2020 Vol.120(1) p. 83-89

Naprienko MV, Latysheva NV, Artemenko AR, Osipova VV, Tabeeva GR, Filatova EG, Akhmadeeva LR, Smekalkina LV

관련 도메인

Abstract

[AIM] To study the compliance of neurologists and headache specialists to chronic headache and chronic migraine (CM) diagnosis and treatment guidelines.

[MATERIAL AND METHODS] The survey included 634 neurologists from all regions of the Russian Federation. Mean age of respondents was 40.7±8.5 years, mean years of experience 14.2±7.8 years.

[RESULTS] Most doctors work in outpatient or hospital settings (49% and 24%, respectively), 7% were headache specialists. Tension-type headache (TTH) was diagnosed in 30% and CM in 17% of patients while 44% of patients were presumed to have a mixed headache disorder (TTH+CM). Only 10% of physicians do not use instrumental diagnostic methods in chronic headache. This study has shown sufficient attention to comorbid conditions and frequent prescription of headache preventative treatment. Botox prescription data is equivocal: 35% of physicians recommend such treatment, 27% do not, while other doctors prescribe it for off-label indications.

[CONCLUSION] To overcome clinical inertia, further education in chronic headaches and their optimal treatment is warranted.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 botox 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Chronic Disease; Headache; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Neurologists; Russia; Tension-Type Headache

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문