A comparative study between intradermal botulinum toxin A and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.
Microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis radiofrequency (RF) technology is a new modality that applied deep heat energy directly affecting the epidermis and
- p-value p = 0.0332
- p-value p = 0.004
APA
Rummaneethorn P, Chalermchai T (2020). A comparative study between intradermal botulinum toxin A and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.. Lasers in medical science, 35(5), 1179-1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02958-8
MLA
Rummaneethorn P, et al.. "A comparative study between intradermal botulinum toxin A and fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.." Lasers in medical science, vol. 35, no. 5, 2020, pp. 1179-1184.
PMID
31939036
Abstract
Microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis radiofrequency (RF) technology is a new modality that applied deep heat energy directly affecting the epidermis and dermis. Limiting data about FMR for axillary hyperhidrosis is concerning. To compare clinical efficacy between fractional microneedle radiofrequency and intradermal botulinum toxin type A injection. This study was a randomized, intraindividual split-side comparative study. Twenty female subjects clinically diagnosed of primary axillary hyperhidrosis were enrolled. All subjects randomly assigned to receive either FMR device on one side of axilla or 50 units of intradermal botulinum toxin A on contralateral side of axilla. Treatment with FMR device was scheduled for 2 sessions for 4 weeks apart. After treatment, mean Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) of both groups revealed remarkably better reduction from the baseline (p < 000.1). By comparing between the two groups at the endpoint visit (12th week), the botulinum toxin A group had significantly better reduction of mean HDSS score than the microneedle RF group with 1.60 (0.59) versus 2.05 (0.68), respectively (p = 0.0332). At the week-12 visit, the botulinum toxin A group had significantly better participant's satisfaction score by quartile rating scale than the microneedle RF group (2.55 + 0.69 versus 1.70 + 1.03, respectively, p = 0.004). Therefore, the botulinum toxin A group also demonstrated with significantly better improvement for their quality of life by DLQI score at the 12th week than the microneedle RF group (p = 0.013). Intradermal botulinum toxin A had better efficacy than fractional microneedle radiofrequency for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | botulinum toxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 7 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Axilla; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hyperhidrosis; Injections, Intradermal; Middle Aged; Needles; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Radio Waves; Self Report; Treatment Outcome; Water Loss, Insensible; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.