Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells may be a viable treatment modality in cerebral palsy.

World journal of clinical cases 2024 Vol.12(9) p. 1585-1596

Boyalı O, Kabatas S, Civelek E, Ozdemir O, Bahar-Ozdemir Y, Kaplan N, Savrunlu EC, Karaöz E

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Cerebral palsy (CP) describes a group of disorders affecting movement, balance, and posture. Disturbances in motor functions constitute the main body of CP symptoms. These symptoms surface in early childhood and patients are affected for the rest of their lives. Currently, treatment involves various pharmacotherapies for different types of CP, including antiepileptics for epilepsy and Botox A for focal spasticity. However, none of these methods can provide full symptom relief. This has prompted researchers to look for new treatment modalities, one of which is mesenchymal stem cell therapy (MSCT). Despite being a promising tool and offering a wide array of possibilities, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) still need to be investigated for their efficacy and safety.

[AIM] To analyze the efficacy and safety of MSCT in CP patients.

[METHODS] Our sample consists of four CP patients who cannot stand or walk without external support. All of these cases received allogeneic MSCT six times as 1 × 10/kg intrathecally, intravenously, and intramuscularly using umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSC). We monitored and assessed the patients pre- and post-treatment using the Wee Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), and Manual Ability Classification Scale (MACS) instruments. We utilized the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to measure spasticity.

[RESULTS] We found significant improvements in MAS scores after the intervention on both sides. Two months: Right = 4000, = 0.046, left = 4000, = 0.046; four months: Right = 4000, = 0.046, left = 4000, = 0.046; 12 months: Right = 4000, = 0.046, left = 4000, = 0.046. However, there was no significant difference in motor functions based on WeeFIM results ( > 0.05). GMFCS and MACS scores differed significantly at 12 months after the intervention ( = 0.046, = 0.046). Finally, there was no significant change in cognitive functions ( > 0.05).

[CONCLUSION] In light of our findings, we believe that UC-MSC therapy has a positive effect on spasticity, and it partially improves motor functions.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 botox 보툴리눔독소 주사 dict 1
해부 mesenchymal stem cells scispacy 1
해부 cerebral scispacy 1
해부 focal scispacy 1
해부 mesenchymal stem cell scispacy 1
해부 MSCs → mesenchymal stem cells scispacy 1
해부 intravenously scispacy 1
해부 umbilical cord-derived MSCs scispacy 1
해부 UC-MSC → umbilical cord-derived MSCs scispacy 1
해부 MACS → Manual Ability Classification Scale scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] Cerebral palsy scispacy 1
약물 antiepileptics scispacy 1
질환 Allogeneic mesenchymal stem scispacy 1
질환 cerebral palsy C0007789
Cerebral Palsy
scispacy 1
질환 Disturbances in motor functions scispacy 1
질환 epilepsy C0014544
Epilepsy
scispacy 1
질환 spasticity C0026838
Muscle Spasticity
scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 Botox A scispacy 1

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문