The access and invasiveness-based classification of medical procedures to clarify non-invasive from different forms of minimally invasive and open surgery.
TL;DR
The current confusion of terms used for procedures that are less invasive than the open surgical alternatives leads to confusion and possible false patient expectations are shown and an AI classification based on access and invasiveness is proposed.
The current confusion of terms used for procedures that are less invasive than the open surgical alternatives leads to confusion and possible false patient expectations are shown and an AI classificat
APA
Whiteley MS, Davey SE, Placzek GM (2024). The access and invasiveness-based classification of medical procedures to clarify non-invasive from different forms of minimally invasive and open surgery.. Journal of minimal access surgery, 20(3), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_240_23
MLA
Whiteley MS, et al.. "The access and invasiveness-based classification of medical procedures to clarify non-invasive from different forms of minimally invasive and open surgery.." Journal of minimal access surgery, vol. 20, no. 3, 2024, pp. 301-310.
PMID
39047678
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The rapid development of less invasive and traumatic medical procedures has resulted in a mixture of terms used to describe them, without any agreed definition for each. This is confusing to both medical professionals and patients and can lead to unrealistic patient expectations. The aim of this article is to show the current confused nomenclature and to suggest a new, simple classification based on access and invasiveness (AI) that can be applied to any medical procedure.
[METHODS] We performed an online search for definitions for 'non-invasive', 'non-surgical', 'minimally invasive', 'minimal access', 'pinhole' and 'keyhole'. We then searched peer-reviewed medical papers (PRMPs) and patient facing websites (PFWs) for the following index procedures, to see which of the original 6 terms were used to describe them: transvaginal ultrasound, sclerotherapy for leg veins, botulinum toxin injections, dermal fillers, endovenous thermal ablation and laparoscopic gall bladder removal.
[RESULTS] We found a wide variety of definitions for each of the initial terms. In both PRMPs and PFWs, there were a variety of terms used for each index procedure (i.e.: transvaginal ultrasound, injections of sclerotherapy, botulinum toxin or dermal fillers being both 'non-invasive' and 'minimally invasive') showing confusion in the classification of procedures. We suggested the 'AI classification' based on access (A - none, B - natural orifice or C - penetrating an epithelial surface) and invasiveness (1 - none, 2 - surface damage, 3 - needle = <21G, 4 - cannula >21G but not a surgical trocar, 5 - surgical trocars or small incisions and 6 - incisions).
[CONCLUSION] The current confusion of terms used for procedures that are less invasive than the open surgical alternatives leads to confusion and possible false patient expectations. We have proposed an AI classification that can be applied easily to any procedure, giving a uniform classification for medical professionals and patients to understand.
[METHODS] We performed an online search for definitions for 'non-invasive', 'non-surgical', 'minimally invasive', 'minimal access', 'pinhole' and 'keyhole'. We then searched peer-reviewed medical papers (PRMPs) and patient facing websites (PFWs) for the following index procedures, to see which of the original 6 terms were used to describe them: transvaginal ultrasound, sclerotherapy for leg veins, botulinum toxin injections, dermal fillers, endovenous thermal ablation and laparoscopic gall bladder removal.
[RESULTS] We found a wide variety of definitions for each of the initial terms. In both PRMPs and PFWs, there were a variety of terms used for each index procedure (i.e.: transvaginal ultrasound, injections of sclerotherapy, botulinum toxin or dermal fillers being both 'non-invasive' and 'minimally invasive') showing confusion in the classification of procedures. We suggested the 'AI classification' based on access (A - none, B - natural orifice or C - penetrating an epithelial surface) and invasiveness (1 - none, 2 - surface damage, 3 - needle = <21G, 4 - cannula >21G but not a surgical trocar, 5 - surgical trocars or small incisions and 6 - incisions).
[CONCLUSION] The current confusion of terms used for procedures that are less invasive than the open surgical alternatives leads to confusion and possible false patient expectations. We have proposed an AI classification that can be applied easily to any procedure, giving a uniform classification for medical professionals and patients to understand.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | botulinum toxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | epithelial surface
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | dermal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | dermal fillers
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | invasiveness-based
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | traumatic
|
C0332663
Traumatic
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | confusion
|
C0009676
Confusion
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | leg veins
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | PRMPs
→ peer-reviewed medical papers
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | PFWs
→ patient facing websites
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.