Living With Spasticity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Carer and Physician Experiences.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Approximately 4.4 million people in England (8% of the total population) are living with a long-term neurological condition. Within this group of vulnerable individuals, there will be individuals living with severe spasticity that requires regular outpatient treatment with botulinum toxin injection. The closure of outpatient spasticity services during the pandemic impacted individuals who required spasticity treatment and their carers, as well as the specialist clinicians responsible for service delivery.
[OBJECTIVES] We aimed to gain insight into the experiences of individuals living with spasticity, their carers and a clinical spasticity service lead during the pandemic, and to reflect on potential learning for the future.
[METHODS] A qualitative study was designed using semi-structured interviews conducted by telephone. Participants comprised patients living with a long-term neurological condition who attended outpatient spasticity clinics before the start of the pandemic in England, primary carers who accompanied patients attending these clinics and a clinical spasticity service lead. Data were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymised and coded. Data analysis utilised the One Sheet of Paper thematic approach to identify themes, which were discussed and analysed by the interdisciplinary research team and two patient and carer participants.
[RESULTS] Out of the 11 participants recruited, aged 36-77 years, seven comprised people living with spasticity related to a long-term neurological condition, three were carers and one was a clinical spasticity service lead. Six participants were male and five were female. Among the participants, four were stroke survivors, two were living with spinal cord injury and one was living with multiple sclerosis. Analysis revealed six major themes: experience of living with spasticity during the pandemic; impact of the pandemic on patient, carer and clinician health; access to and experience of outpatient clinic appointments; coping strategies during the pandemic; system improvements; and learning from the pandemic period.
[CONCLUSION] These findings contribute research knowledge to a very limited research knowledge base and suggest that there is scope for improving system and service delivery through the allocation of research funding to senior clinicians working in this specialist area.
[OBJECTIVES] We aimed to gain insight into the experiences of individuals living with spasticity, their carers and a clinical spasticity service lead during the pandemic, and to reflect on potential learning for the future.
[METHODS] A qualitative study was designed using semi-structured interviews conducted by telephone. Participants comprised patients living with a long-term neurological condition who attended outpatient spasticity clinics before the start of the pandemic in England, primary carers who accompanied patients attending these clinics and a clinical spasticity service lead. Data were audio recorded, transcribed, anonymised and coded. Data analysis utilised the One Sheet of Paper thematic approach to identify themes, which were discussed and analysed by the interdisciplinary research team and two patient and carer participants.
[RESULTS] Out of the 11 participants recruited, aged 36-77 years, seven comprised people living with spasticity related to a long-term neurological condition, three were carers and one was a clinical spasticity service lead. Six participants were male and five were female. Among the participants, four were stroke survivors, two were living with spinal cord injury and one was living with multiple sclerosis. Analysis revealed six major themes: experience of living with spasticity during the pandemic; impact of the pandemic on patient, carer and clinician health; access to and experience of outpatient clinic appointments; coping strategies during the pandemic; system improvements; and learning from the pandemic period.
[CONCLUSION] These findings contribute research knowledge to a very limited research knowledge base and suggest that there is scope for improving system and service delivery through the allocation of research funding to senior clinicians working in this specialist area.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | botulinum toxin
|
보툴리눔독소 주사 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | spinal cord
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | COVID-19
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Spasticity
|
C0026838
Muscle Spasticity
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | stroke
|
C0038454
Cerebrovascular accident
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | cord injury
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | multiple sclerosis
|
C0026769
Multiple Sclerosis
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Physician
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | people
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | participants
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | female
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; COVID-19; Muscle Spasticity; Female; Male; Qualitative Research; Middle Aged; Caregivers; Adult; Aged; England; Interviews as Topic; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Local therapeutic strategies for neurocutaneous dysesthesia: from capsaicin to cannabinoids.
- Comparative efficacy of intralesional therapies for keloid scars: a network meta-analysis.
- Adverse neurological events following botulinum toxin type A: A case series of post-injection seizures and paralysis.
- Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A.
- Current Perspectives on Pectoralis Minor Syndrome: A Narrative Review.