Soft tissue response after chin advancement using two different genioplasty techniques: a preliminary technical comparative study.
[PURPOSE] The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue response after chin advancement using 2 different genioplasty techniques.
APA
Seifeldin SA, Shawky M, Hicham Nouman SM (2014). Soft tissue response after chin advancement using two different genioplasty techniques: a preliminary technical comparative study.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 25(4), 1383-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000863
MLA
Seifeldin SA, et al.. "Soft tissue response after chin advancement using two different genioplasty techniques: a preliminary technical comparative study.." The Journal of craniofacial surgery, vol. 25, no. 4, 2014, pp. 1383-8.
PMID
24926726
Abstract
[PURPOSE] The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue response after chin advancement using 2 different genioplasty techniques.
[METHODS] The study included 8 adult patients who were divided equally into 2 groups: group 1 was surgically treated by sliding genioplasty, and group 2 was surgically treated by chin shield genioplasty for the correction of retruded or deficient chin. Lateral cephalograms were taken twice: immediately preoperative and 6 months postoperative.
[RESULTS] The mean (SD) change of soft tissue pogonion (Pg') was 4.7 (0.3) mm in group 1, whereas in group 2, the mean (SD) change of soft tissue pogonion (Pg') was 6.2 (4.8) mm. The mean (SD) change in the labiomental depth in group 1 was 0.9 (0.3) mm, whereas in group 2, it was 0.2 (0.5) mm. So in group 2, chin shield genioplasty contributed to a less labiomental fold depth. The ratio of soft tissue response to bony movement in the sliding genioplasty technique was 1:0.83, whereas in the chin shield genioplasty technique, it was 1:0.99.
[CONCLUSIONS] In the chin shield genioplasty technique, the increase in labiomental fold depth was less than in the sliding genioplasty technique.
[METHODS] The study included 8 adult patients who were divided equally into 2 groups: group 1 was surgically treated by sliding genioplasty, and group 2 was surgically treated by chin shield genioplasty for the correction of retruded or deficient chin. Lateral cephalograms were taken twice: immediately preoperative and 6 months postoperative.
[RESULTS] The mean (SD) change of soft tissue pogonion (Pg') was 4.7 (0.3) mm in group 1, whereas in group 2, the mean (SD) change of soft tissue pogonion (Pg') was 6.2 (4.8) mm. The mean (SD) change in the labiomental depth in group 1 was 0.9 (0.3) mm, whereas in group 2, it was 0.2 (0.5) mm. So in group 2, chin shield genioplasty contributed to a less labiomental fold depth. The ratio of soft tissue response to bony movement in the sliding genioplasty technique was 1:0.83, whereas in the chin shield genioplasty technique, it was 1:0.99.
[CONCLUSIONS] In the chin shield genioplasty technique, the increase in labiomental fold depth was less than in the sliding genioplasty technique.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | genioplasty
|
턱끝성형술 | dict | 6 | |
| 시술 | sliding genioplasty
|
턱끝성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | Soft tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | soft tissue pogonion
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | labiomental
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | chin shield
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | labiomental
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] In
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Pg'
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Pg')
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Cephalometry; Cheek; Chin; Female; Genioplasty; Humans; Lip; Male; Nose; Operative Time; Osteotomy; Palate; Periodontal Index; Photography; Radiography, Panoramic; Tongue; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Long-term effects of inferior alveolar nerve injury on the quality of life of orthognathic patients: a clinical assessment.
- Mapping the Mandibular Lingual Foramina for Safer Chin Surgery: CT Morphometry and Predictive Modeling.
- Effectiveness and Safety of a Polyvinyl Alcohol Microsphere and Hyaluronic Acid Suspension for Chin Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Multidisciplinary Study.
- Safety and Effectiveness of Two High-G' Soft Tissue Fillers for Chin Augmentation: A Prospective, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Evaluator-Blinded Trial.
- Minimally Invasive Protocol for the Management of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: Case Series on Seven Patients.