본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Facial Transplants: What are Authentic Faces?

Acta historica Leopoldina 2016 p. 171-182

Gilman SL

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 본 연구는 얼굴 이식(face transplant)과 미용 성형수술(cosmetic surgery)의 개념적 경계, 특히 '재건(reconstruction)'과 '개선(improvement)'의 차이를 문화적·역사적 맥락에서 고찰한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Gilman SL (2016). Facial Transplants: What are Authentic Faces?. Acta historica Leopoldina(65), 171-182.
MLA Gilman SL. "Facial Transplants: What are Authentic Faces?." Acta historica Leopoldina, no. 65, 2016, pp. 171-182.
PMID 29489117

Abstract

Do our faces reflect who we are? Or do they display the person we would like to be? Or even the person our society would like us to be? What is the difference between "enhancement" and "reconstruction", between "improving" facial features and restoring them? To what extent is the definition of these terms determined by cultural assumptions, particularly when it comes to what makes our appearance "authentic"? This article critically investigates the frequently circulating opinion that face transplants serve to reconstruct, while cosmetic surgery "improves" our appearance according to our wishes. The historical case study presented here begins with the history of nose operations in Berlin in the 19" century and ends with the practice of face transplants in the 21st century.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 nose scispacy 1
합병증 Facial Transplants scispacy 1
합병증 facial scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Facial Transplantation; Female; Germany; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; History, 21st Century; Humans; Male; Rhinoplasty; Surgery, Plastic

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)