[Quality of publications in plastic surgery].

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 2016 Vol.61(1) p. 1-9

Mornet O, Grolleau JL, Garrido I, Bekara F, Herlin C, Chaput B

관련 도메인

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] The objective of this study is to describe plastic surgery publications in terms of methodology, level of evidence, approval by institutional review board, method of consent, and subspecialty.

[METHODS] The 8 top-ranked plastic surgery journals were selected. We manually reviewed the last 40 original articles in each plastic surgery journal, to represent more than 2 months of publications for all journals (range: 3-17 months). Only clinical original articles on human subjects were included. Each article was read at least twice by two different reviewers to ensure accurate data transcription, and then graded by written criteria. One of the senior authors was asked to make a final decision in case of doubt.

[RESULTS] Among the articles reviewed, 320 were analyzed. The geographical origin of these publications were Asia (32.5%), Europe (30%), US (28.4%), South America (5.6%), Africa (2.5%), and finally Oceania (1%). Reconstructive surgery remains the specialty area most represented in the journals with almost half of the publications, followed by breast surgery (24%) and plastic surgery (19%). A total of 75.6% were retrospective studies. Nearly 80% of the studies were of low level of evidence. Only 3.5% were randomized trials. Less than 40% of the publications mentioned approval by an institutional committee, and 22.6% a patient's informed consent.

[CONCLUSION] This study aimed to analyze the quality of plastic surgery publications, taking into account the criteria of Evidence Based Medicine. This work showed that more than half of the studies did not mention an institutional review board approval (Ethics Committee), and that three quarter of the studies did not indicate the presence of patient's informed consent. Ultimately, over 80% of the studies were of low level of evidence. The top-ranked journals have already imposed guidelines corresponding to the methodology requirements to publish clinical studies in their pages, such as EQUATOR criteria for the PRS journal. Efforts are therefore to be done to raise the scientific level of the publications of our specialty.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 1
약물 PRS C1839730
Prieto syndrome
scispacy 1
약물 [INTRODUCTION] scispacy 1
질환 PRS scispacy 1
기타 human scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Evidence-Based Medicine; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Mammaplasty; Periodicals as Topic; Publications; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgery, Plastic

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문