Evaluation of Long-Term Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Results After Tumescent Liposuction.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Liposuction is one of the most common cosmetic surgery procedures around the world. Tumescent liposuction using local anesthesia has been shown to be the safest technique. Few long-term studies of results and satisfaction have been published on tumescent liposuction.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate long-term results and patient satisfaction of tumescent liposuction in a single-center institution.
[METHODS] Patients (n = 600) who had tumescent liposuction performed in our practice from 2002 to 2014 were contacted through letter, email, or phone to complete a questionnaire survey and in-office follow-up visit regarding their past liposuction procedures.
[RESULTS] Thirty-two patients (n = 32) completed the patient questionnaire survey and followed up in the office. Surgeon and blinded evaluators saw significant differences in both the neck volume (surgeon evaluator: 2.42 vs. 0.71, p < .01; blinded evaluator: 2.8-1, p = .02) and Investigator Assessment Skin Laxity scales (blinded evaluator: 1.14 vs. 0.77, p < .01 for laxity and 1.33 vs. 0.75, p < .01 for firmness; surgeon evaluator: 1.17 vs. 0.83, p = .01 for laxity and 1.31 vs. 0.83; p < .01 for firmness). The mean follow-up period was 8.9 years overall and 9.9 years for the neck. Overall, 85.7% of the patients would recommend liposuction to their friends and family members.
[CONCLUSION] Tumescent liposuction is a safe procedure with long-lasting results and high patient satisfaction.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate long-term results and patient satisfaction of tumescent liposuction in a single-center institution.
[METHODS] Patients (n = 600) who had tumescent liposuction performed in our practice from 2002 to 2014 were contacted through letter, email, or phone to complete a questionnaire survey and in-office follow-up visit regarding their past liposuction procedures.
[RESULTS] Thirty-two patients (n = 32) completed the patient questionnaire survey and followed up in the office. Surgeon and blinded evaluators saw significant differences in both the neck volume (surgeon evaluator: 2.42 vs. 0.71, p < .01; blinded evaluator: 2.8-1, p = .02) and Investigator Assessment Skin Laxity scales (blinded evaluator: 1.14 vs. 0.77, p < .01 for laxity and 1.33 vs. 0.75, p < .01 for firmness; surgeon evaluator: 1.17 vs. 0.83, p = .01 for laxity and 1.31 vs. 0.83; p < .01 for firmness). The mean follow-up period was 8.9 years overall and 9.9 years for the neck. Overall, 85.7% of the patients would recommend liposuction to their friends and family members.
[CONCLUSION] Tumescent liposuction is a safe procedure with long-lasting results and high patient satisfaction.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | liposuction
|
지방흡입 | dict | 9 | |
| 해부 | Skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Long-Term
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Liposuction
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Anesthesia, Local; Anesthetics, Local; Esthetics; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lidocaine; Lipectomy; Male; Middle Aged; Procedural Pain; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Quantitative Assessment of Cannula Kinematics in Liposuction Surgical Procedures Using a Marker-Based Tracking System.
- Fat harvesting protocol for enhanced stem cell viability - pilot study.
- Scarless Infragluteal Fixation (SIF): Correction of Post-Liposuction Infragluteal Deformity.
- [Super microsurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for limb lymphedema: An outcome analysis based on clinical stage and indocyanine green pattern].
- Iatrogenic pneumothorax associated with surgeries at anatomically thoracic-adjacent and non-adjacent sites: case report and scoping review.