Ghost Publications and Research Misrepresentation in the 2023-2024 Plastic Surgery Common Application.

[PURPOSE] United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 Pass/Fail grading has increased the emphasis of research productivity as a quantitative metric in residency applications. Quantifying discrepancies between self-reported and verified research publications can elucidate the extent of research misrepresentation in submitted residency applications.

[METHODS] A retrospective review of 339 residency applications to our institution's integrated plastic surgery residency program in the 2023-2024 application cycle was performed. The number of self-reported publications reported between applicants' plastic surgery common application (PSCA) and curriculum vitae (CV) were recorded. Self-reported publications were denoted as verified if a publication record was identified with an independent internet search.

[RESULTS] The mean number of self-reported and verified total peer-reviewed publications was 10.8 and 7.4, respectively. In 9.1% (31/339) of applicants, unverified manuscripts or discrepancies between self-reported and verified author lists were identified. Unpublished manuscripts and publication records of nonpeer-reviewed abstract presentation records were self-reported under the PSCA total number of proportion of unmatched applicants (62%) versus matched applicants (48%) misrepresented unpublished manuscripts or nonpeer-reviewed abstract presentation records as peer-reviewed publications (P = 0.011).

[CONCLUSIONS] Several types of discrepancies between self-reported and verified research publications were identified in PSCA applications. Discrepancies may result from PSCA prompt misinterpretation, inadvertent misclassification, or applicant misrepresentation or falsification. Efforts to standardize the reporting and verification of research in residency applications are needed.