A Systematic Review of Helium Plasma Radiofrequency (Renuvion).
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Helium plasma radiofrequency (Renuvion, previously J-Plasma) is a new energy-based device that causes coagulation of the subcutaneous fat. The device has recently received 501(k) clearance by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for soft tissue contraction after liposuction. A systematic review has not been previously published.
[METHODS] An electronic search was undertaken to identify publications describing clinical experience with this technique. The US government clinical trials website and the FDA website were queried. The CMS Open Payments database was accessed to evaluate financial bias.
[RESULTS] Twenty-five publications contained patient data with sufficient information for tabulation. Treatment areas included the face, neck, female and male breasts, trunk, and extremities, usually in combination with liposuction. Studies typically reported subjective surgeon evaluations of photographs and surveys. None of the studies provided standardized photographs with measurements comparing Renuvion to traditional methods. Measurements on matched photographs of breasts treated with Renuvion did not substantiate the authors' claims. The findings of an ultrasound study of the abdominal fat layer were undermined by incorrect labeling of the tissue planes. Most studies were funded by the manufacturer and most investigators had financial conflicts. Few studies mentioned subcutaneous emphysema. Four case reports described patients who suffered helium-induced pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumomastia. Adverse events reported to the FDA included 15 life-threatening events and 3 fatalities. Full-thickness burns were frequently reported. The number and severity of the adverse events greatly exceeded those reported for radiofrequency and ultrasound devices.
[DISCUSSION] No evidence supports a claim of skin tightening beyond that which may be achieved using traditional or ultrasonic liposuction. Helium gas may permeate body cavities, with serious repercussions.
[CONCLUSIONS] Marketing has taken precedence over science and safety considerations. This technology introduces serious safety risks to patients, including death, with no proven compensatory benefit.
[METHODS] An electronic search was undertaken to identify publications describing clinical experience with this technique. The US government clinical trials website and the FDA website were queried. The CMS Open Payments database was accessed to evaluate financial bias.
[RESULTS] Twenty-five publications contained patient data with sufficient information for tabulation. Treatment areas included the face, neck, female and male breasts, trunk, and extremities, usually in combination with liposuction. Studies typically reported subjective surgeon evaluations of photographs and surveys. None of the studies provided standardized photographs with measurements comparing Renuvion to traditional methods. Measurements on matched photographs of breasts treated with Renuvion did not substantiate the authors' claims. The findings of an ultrasound study of the abdominal fat layer were undermined by incorrect labeling of the tissue planes. Most studies were funded by the manufacturer and most investigators had financial conflicts. Few studies mentioned subcutaneous emphysema. Four case reports described patients who suffered helium-induced pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumoperitoneum, and pneumomastia. Adverse events reported to the FDA included 15 life-threatening events and 3 fatalities. Full-thickness burns were frequently reported. The number and severity of the adverse events greatly exceeded those reported for radiofrequency and ultrasound devices.
[DISCUSSION] No evidence supports a claim of skin tightening beyond that which may be achieved using traditional or ultrasonic liposuction. Helium gas may permeate body cavities, with serious repercussions.
[CONCLUSIONS] Marketing has taken precedence over science and safety considerations. This technology introduces serious safety risks to patients, including death, with no proven compensatory benefit.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | liposuction
|
지방흡입 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | subcutaneous
|
피하조직 | dict | 2 | |
| 해부 | subcutaneous fat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | soft tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | trunk
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | breasts
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | abdominal fat layer
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | tissue
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | neck
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | extremities
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Helium
|
C0018880
helium
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] Helium
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Food
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | FDA
→ Food and Drug Administration
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breasts, trunk, and extremities
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breasts
|
C0006141
Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | emphysema
|
C0013990
Pathological accumulation of air in tissues
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | pneumomediastinum
|
C0025062
Mediastinal Emphysema
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | burns
|
C0006434
Burn injury
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | death
|
C0011065
Cessation of life
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | female
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Helium; Lipectomy; Subcutaneous Fat; Female; Plasma Gases; Male
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.
- Hyperhidrosis: Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Stepwise Treatment.
- Application of the SCIA-Pure Skin Perforator Flap in Bilateral Upper Eyelid Reconstruction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
- Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimen for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
- Immediate one-stage subcutaneous breast reconstruction without ADM: A single-center 6-year experience.