Pain relief following breast augmentation surgery: a comparison between incisional patient-controlled regional analgesia and traditional oral analgesia.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] Postoperative pain is a common problem following ambulatory breast augmentation surgery. This study was performed to compare standard of care (oral analgesics) with patient-controlled incisional regional analgesia (PCRA) for postoperative pain management at home for 48 h. A second aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine 0.25% vs. 0.5%.
[METHODS] Surgery was performed under local anaesthesia and monitored anesthesia care. Sixty adults (ASA 1-2) were randomized to one of two groups. Patients in Group PCRA could self-administer ropivacaine 0.25% 10 mL in the left breast and ropivacaine 0.5% in the right breast. Patients in Group T (tablets) received our standard of care treatment, i.e. oral paracetamol 1 g four times a day and oral ibuprofen 500 mg three times a day. Parameters measured included: analgesic requirements (in post-anesthesia care unit, PACU and post-discharge), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction, global analgesia, side-effects, and quality of recovery.
[RESULTS] Pain scores were significantly lower in Group PCRA compared to Group T at all time periods (P < 0.05). No differences were found in pain scores between the right and left breasts. Significantly more patients in Group T requested analgesics in the recovery unit (27 vs. 7; P = 0.001) and also at home (20 vs. 11; P < 0.02). More patients in the tablet group had nausea and vomiting (10 vs. 3; P < 0.05). Global analgesia on day 2 was significantly better in PCRA group; however, patient satisfaction was similar in both groups. More patients in the tablet group had sleep disturbance and woke up at night due to pain.
[CONCLUSIONS] Pain relief after ambulatory breast augmentation is superior with incisional PCRA when compared to oral analgesic combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Incisional PCRA was associated with minimal side-effects and less sleep disturbance. There was no difference in the analgesic efficacy between ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%.
[METHODS] Surgery was performed under local anaesthesia and monitored anesthesia care. Sixty adults (ASA 1-2) were randomized to one of two groups. Patients in Group PCRA could self-administer ropivacaine 0.25% 10 mL in the left breast and ropivacaine 0.5% in the right breast. Patients in Group T (tablets) received our standard of care treatment, i.e. oral paracetamol 1 g four times a day and oral ibuprofen 500 mg three times a day. Parameters measured included: analgesic requirements (in post-anesthesia care unit, PACU and post-discharge), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction, global analgesia, side-effects, and quality of recovery.
[RESULTS] Pain scores were significantly lower in Group PCRA compared to Group T at all time periods (P < 0.05). No differences were found in pain scores between the right and left breasts. Significantly more patients in Group T requested analgesics in the recovery unit (27 vs. 7; P = 0.001) and also at home (20 vs. 11; P < 0.02). More patients in the tablet group had nausea and vomiting (10 vs. 3; P < 0.05). Global analgesia on day 2 was significantly better in PCRA group; however, patient satisfaction was similar in both groups. More patients in the tablet group had sleep disturbance and woke up at night due to pain.
[CONCLUSIONS] Pain relief after ambulatory breast augmentation is superior with incisional PCRA when compared to oral analgesic combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Incisional PCRA was associated with minimal side-effects and less sleep disturbance. There was no difference in the analgesic efficacy between ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 5 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 3 | |
| 해부 | oral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | oral ibuprofen
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | oral paracetamol 1
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | post-anesthesia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | incisional PCRA
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ropivacaine
|
C0073571
ropivacaine
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | paracetamol
|
C0000970
acetaminophen
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | ibuprofen
|
C0020740
ibuprofen
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | post-anesthesia
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ASA 1-2
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | tablet
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Pain
|
C0030193
Pain
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Postoperative pain
|
C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | nausea and vomiting
|
C0027498
Nausea and vomiting
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | sleep disturbance
|
C0037317
Sleep disturbances
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Administration, Oral; Adult; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Amides; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Anesthetics; Breast; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Postoperative Pain; Ropivacaine; Time Factors
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.