Pain relief following breast augmentation surgery: a comparison between incisional patient-controlled regional analgesia and traditional oral analgesia.

European journal of anaesthesiology 2006 Vol.23(12) p. 1010-7

Rawal N, Gupta A, Helsing M, Grell K, Allvin R

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] Postoperative pain is a common problem following ambulatory breast augmentation surgery. This study was performed to compare standard of care (oral analgesics) with patient-controlled incisional regional analgesia (PCRA) for postoperative pain management at home for 48 h. A second aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine 0.25% vs. 0.5%.

[METHODS] Surgery was performed under local anaesthesia and monitored anesthesia care. Sixty adults (ASA 1-2) were randomized to one of two groups. Patients in Group PCRA could self-administer ropivacaine 0.25% 10 mL in the left breast and ropivacaine 0.5% in the right breast. Patients in Group T (tablets) received our standard of care treatment, i.e. oral paracetamol 1 g four times a day and oral ibuprofen 500 mg three times a day. Parameters measured included: analgesic requirements (in post-anesthesia care unit, PACU and post-discharge), pain intensity (visual analogue scale), patient satisfaction, global analgesia, side-effects, and quality of recovery.

[RESULTS] Pain scores were significantly lower in Group PCRA compared to Group T at all time periods (P < 0.05). No differences were found in pain scores between the right and left breasts. Significantly more patients in Group T requested analgesics in the recovery unit (27 vs. 7; P = 0.001) and also at home (20 vs. 11; P < 0.02). More patients in the tablet group had nausea and vomiting (10 vs. 3; P < 0.05). Global analgesia on day 2 was significantly better in PCRA group; however, patient satisfaction was similar in both groups. More patients in the tablet group had sleep disturbance and woke up at night due to pain.

[CONCLUSIONS] Pain relief after ambulatory breast augmentation is superior with incisional PCRA when compared to oral analgesic combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen. Incisional PCRA was associated with minimal side-effects and less sleep disturbance. There was no difference in the analgesic efficacy between ropivacaine 0.25% and 0.5%.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 5
시술 breast augmentation 유방성형술 dict 3
해부 oral scispacy 1
해부 oral ibuprofen scispacy 1
합병증 oral paracetamol 1 scispacy 1
합병증 post-anesthesia scispacy 1
합병증 incisional PCRA scispacy 1
약물 ropivacaine C0073571
ropivacaine
scispacy 1
약물 paracetamol C0000970
acetaminophen
scispacy 1
약물 ibuprofen C0020740
ibuprofen
scispacy 1
약물 post-anesthesia scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES] scispacy 1
약물 ASA 1-2 scispacy 1
약물 tablet scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] scispacy 1
질환 Pain C0030193
Pain
scispacy 1
질환 Postoperative pain C0030201
Pain, Postoperative
scispacy 1
질환 nausea and vomiting C0027498
Nausea and vomiting
scispacy 1
질환 sleep disturbance C0037317
Sleep disturbances
scispacy 1
기타 Patients scispacy 1
기타 patient scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Administration, Oral; Adult; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Amides; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Anesthetics; Breast; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Postoperative Pain; Ropivacaine; Time Factors

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문