Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] In November 2006, the FDA approved the Premarket Approval PMA applications for the round, cohesive, silicone gel-filled breast implants of Mentor (MemoryGel) and Allergan. Since that time, the devices have been widely available to plastic surgeons and their use is rapidly eclipsing that of the saline breast implants. Patients in the Core clinical studies supporting these approvals continue to be followed through for 10 years, with comprehensive annual patient and physician-reported evaluations of safety and efficacy.
[METHODS] One thousand and eight (1,008) female patients had data collected on 1,898 implants, and were enrolled at 48 sites. Key complication rates were recorded with Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence calculation for each.
[RESULTS] Rupture rate, suspected and confirmed, for primary augmentation was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3-4.3), and that for primary reconstruction patients was 3.8% (95% CI, 1.4-9.8). Capsular contracture rates for clinically significant Baker III/IV contracture for primary augmentation was 9.8% (95% C I, 7.6-12.7), and that for primary reconstruction was 13.7% (95% CI, 9.7-19.1). The reoperation incidence for primary augmentation and primary reconstruction was 19.4 and 33.9%, respectively, with explantation and replacement with a study device in 3.9% of primary augmentations and 10.4% of primary reconstructions.
[CONCLUSIONS] Mentor MemoryGel Silicone Breast implants represent a safe and effective choice for women seeking breast augmentation or breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
[METHODS] One thousand and eight (1,008) female patients had data collected on 1,898 implants, and were enrolled at 48 sites. Key complication rates were recorded with Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence calculation for each.
[RESULTS] Rupture rate, suspected and confirmed, for primary augmentation was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3-4.3), and that for primary reconstruction patients was 3.8% (95% CI, 1.4-9.8). Capsular contracture rates for clinically significant Baker III/IV contracture for primary augmentation was 9.8% (95% C I, 7.6-12.7), and that for primary reconstruction was 13.7% (95% CI, 9.7-19.1). The reoperation incidence for primary augmentation and primary reconstruction was 19.4 and 33.9%, respectively, with explantation and replacement with a study device in 3.9% of primary augmentations and 10.4% of primary reconstructions.
[CONCLUSIONS] Mentor MemoryGel Silicone Breast implants represent a safe and effective choice for women seeking breast augmentation or breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 5 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | capsular contracture
|
피막구축 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND] In
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | FDA
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [CONCLUSIONS] Mentor MemoryGel Silicone Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | silicone gel-filled breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | contracture
|
C0009917
Contracture
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Silicone Breast
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Baker III/IV contracture
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | Patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | C I
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | women
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Contracture; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reoperation
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.