Assessing the effects of changes in care commissioning guidelines at a tertiary centre in London on the provision of NHS-funded procedures of limited clinical effectiveness: an 11-year retrospective database analysis.
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of changes in care commissioning policies on National Health Service (NHS)-funded cosmetic procedures over an 11-year period at our centre.
[SETTING] The setting was a tertiary care hospital in London regulated by the North Central London Hospitals NHS Trust care commissioning group.
[PARTICIPANTS] We included all patients logged on to our database at the time of the study which was 2087 but later excluded 61 from analysis due to insufficient information.
[PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES] The main outcome measures were the results of tribunal assessment for different cosmetic surgeries which were either accepted, rejected or inconclusive based on the panel meeting.
[RESULTS] There were a total of 2087 patient requests considered between 2004 and 2015, of which 715 (34%) were accepted, 1311 (63%) were declined and 61 (3%) had inconclusive results. The implementation of local care commissioning guidelines has reduced access to cosmetic surgeries. Within this period, the proportion of procedures accepted has fallen from 36% in 2004 to 21% in 2015 (χ; p<0.05, 95% CI).
[CONCLUSION] Local guidance on procedures of limited clinical effectiveness is a useful, although not evidence-based selection process to reduce access to cosmetic surgery in line with increasing financial constraints. However, patients with a physical impairment may not receive treatment in comparison to previous years, and this can have a negative impact on their quality of life.
[SETTING] The setting was a tertiary care hospital in London regulated by the North Central London Hospitals NHS Trust care commissioning group.
[PARTICIPANTS] We included all patients logged on to our database at the time of the study which was 2087 but later excluded 61 from analysis due to insufficient information.
[PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES] The main outcome measures were the results of tribunal assessment for different cosmetic surgeries which were either accepted, rejected or inconclusive based on the panel meeting.
[RESULTS] There were a total of 2087 patient requests considered between 2004 and 2015, of which 715 (34%) were accepted, 1311 (63%) were declined and 61 (3%) had inconclusive results. The implementation of local care commissioning guidelines has reduced access to cosmetic surgeries. Within this period, the proportion of procedures accepted has fallen from 36% in 2004 to 21% in 2015 (χ; p<0.05, 95% CI).
[CONCLUSION] Local guidance on procedures of limited clinical effectiveness is a useful, although not evidence-based selection process to reduce access to cosmetic surgery in line with increasing financial constraints. However, patients with a physical impairment may not receive treatment in comparison to previous years, and this can have a negative impact on their quality of life.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | line
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVES]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | NHS-funded
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | p<0.05
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Esthetics; Financing, Government; Guideline Adherence; Guidelines as Topic; Health Care Rationing; Humans; London; Retrospective Studies; Surgery, Plastic; Treatment Outcome