[Delay of professional activity recovery after implant based breast augmentation surgery: Influence of healthcare coverage].
Abstract
[AIM OF THE STUDY] The main goal is to determine if the delay before going back to work after implant-based breast augmentation surgery is influenced by the healthcare coverage criteria.
[MEANS AND METHODS] In this retrospective, single center based study, patients who underwent implant-based breast augmentation surgery (excluding reconstructive surgery) in the past 3 years with a minimum follow-up of 1 month were questioned by telephone. Patients who had early postoperative complications, or no professional activity, were excluded. The demographic and perioperative data were collected and two groups were compared: those who were covered by the healthcare system and those who were not.
[RESULTS] Sixty patients were included. The two groups were comparable concerning the demographic (age, BMI, children, work intensity, smoking status, comorbidity) and surgical data (surgical approach, type, volume and position of the implant, operative time and drainage). There was a significant difference between the groups concerning the delay of return to work (P=0.0001): 18.4 days for reimbursed patients versus 9.45 days for patients without healthcare coverage.
[CONCLUSION] For the same implant-based breast augmentation surgery, and for the same population, the duration of postoperative recovery period doubles for the patients for whom surgery is reimbursed by the healthcare system.
[MEANS AND METHODS] In this retrospective, single center based study, patients who underwent implant-based breast augmentation surgery (excluding reconstructive surgery) in the past 3 years with a minimum follow-up of 1 month were questioned by telephone. Patients who had early postoperative complications, or no professional activity, were excluded. The demographic and perioperative data were collected and two groups were compared: those who were covered by the healthcare system and those who were not.
[RESULTS] Sixty patients were included. The two groups were comparable concerning the demographic (age, BMI, children, work intensity, smoking status, comorbidity) and surgical data (surgical approach, type, volume and position of the implant, operative time and drainage). There was a significant difference between the groups concerning the delay of return to work (P=0.0001): 18.4 days for reimbursed patients versus 9.45 days for patients without healthcare coverage.
[CONCLUSION] For the same implant-based breast augmentation surgery, and for the same population, the duration of postoperative recovery period doubles for the patients for whom surgery is reimbursed by the healthcare system.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 4 | |
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 4 | |
| 약물 | [AIM OF THE STUDY]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | comorbidity
|
C0009488
Comorbidity
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | children
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Breast Implantation; Female; France; Humans; Insurance Coverage; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; National Health Programs; Retrospective Studies; Return to Work
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.