Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Augmentation: A Review.
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The use of autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation is still controversial due to ongoing concerns regarding its efficacy and safety, most notably, concerns about breast cancer risk and detection.
[OBJECTIVE] To summarize the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation with focus on clinical techniques, outcome, and complications.
[METHODS] A thorough search of the literature was conducted using the terms autologous fat transfer, autologous fat grafting, and breast augmentation in the Medline and Embase databases, and relevant English and German language articles were included.
[RESULTS] Findings were categorized in a step-by-step approach to the fat grafting procedure divided into technique (harvesting, processing, and injection), postoperative care, graft viability enhancement, outcome, complications, and breast cancer risk.
[CONCLUSION] Autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation is not yet standardized. Therefore, outcomes vary widely depending on the surgeon's expertise. The majority of reported complications are of low morbidity, and based on available data, the procedure has a good long-term safety profile. Although there is no evidence that fat grafting increases breast malignancy risk, long-term follow-up is required.
[OBJECTIVE] To summarize the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation with focus on clinical techniques, outcome, and complications.
[METHODS] A thorough search of the literature was conducted using the terms autologous fat transfer, autologous fat grafting, and breast augmentation in the Medline and Embase databases, and relevant English and German language articles were included.
[RESULTS] Findings were categorized in a step-by-step approach to the fat grafting procedure divided into technique (harvesting, processing, and injection), postoperative care, graft viability enhancement, outcome, complications, and breast cancer risk.
[CONCLUSION] Autologous fat transfer for breast augmentation is not yet standardized. Therefore, outcomes vary widely depending on the surgeon's expertise. The majority of reported complications are of low morbidity, and based on available data, the procedure has a good long-term safety profile. Although there is no evidence that fat grafting increases breast malignancy risk, long-term follow-up is required.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | breast
|
유방 | dict | 8 | |
| 시술 | breast augmentation
|
유방성형술 | dict | 5 | |
| 해부 | Fat
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | graft
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [BACKGROUND]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | [OBJECTIVE]
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | Embase
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | breast cancer
|
C0006142
Malignant neoplasm of breast
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | breast malignancy
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adipose Tissue; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Postoperative Complications; Transplantation, Autologous
📑 인용 관계
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Cutaneous fistula of the breast: A complication of cosmetic autologous fat transfer.
- Epidermal inclusion cyst after breast reduction mammoplasty.
- Clinical outcomes of synthetic absorbable mesh use in breast surgery: First case series in reconstruction and aesthetic mastopexy.
- Implant-based versus autologous mastopexy after massive weight loss: Complications and patient satisfaction.