Treatment of Complications After Minimally Invasive Breast Augmentation with Aquafilling Gel.

[INTRODUCTION] Recent studies have revealed that Aquafilling gel used for breast augmentation causes complications. In this study, we investigated which surgical approach should be used to treat these complications.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This observational cohort study analysed the data of 31 women suffering from complications after breast enlargement with Aquafilling injection who were treated at our department in 2016-2021. Patients underwent either conservative or radical surgery. GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for data processing.

[RESULTS] Approximately 88.89% of patients after conservative surgery required reoperation, while only 22.73% of patients treated radically needed revision surgery. Every patient who underwent an attempt to remove the gel via needle prior to admission required surgery. Seventy-five per cent of them had positive culture swabs, whereas only 26.09% of patients who did not undergo needle aspiration had positive cultures. A positive correlation between the volume of injected filler and the number of symptoms was observed.

[CONCLUSIONS] In addition to irrigation and drainage, Aquafilling removal should include infiltrated tissue excision during primary surgery. Moreover, needle aspiration of the filler is ineffective, and it may lead to a gel infection. Furthermore, the more filler is injected, the higher the number of complications observed. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .