Is free nipple grafting necessary in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

[BACKGROUND] Gigantomastia is a debilitating condition characterised by an excessive breast tissue growth impacting patients' quality of life. Surgically treatment options include the limited-length pedicle (LP) technique with free nipple grafting (FNG) and the elongated pedicle (EP) technique, which maintains continuity of the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Initially, despite the less satisfactory aesthetic outcome, FNG was preferred to treat hypertrophic breasts requiring resections over 1000 g of parenchymal and adipose tissue, due to concerns about NAC perfusion. Recently, many studies have questioned this indication. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the safety of the NAC-carrying EP technique in patients with gigantomastia eventually challenging the need for FNG.

[METHODS] A literature search using PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed, including studies describing the outcome of EP technique for resection exceeding 1000 g of breast tissue. Thereby, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the rate of NAC necrosis, whereas a descriptive statistic was applied to assess all other surgery-associated complications.

[RESULTS] Twenty-five studies, encompassing 1355 patients (2656 breasts), were included. EP demonstrated an extremely low rate of NAC necrosis. Moreover, the analysis demonstrated a low rate of ischaemia-independent complications and a very high probability of maintaining NAC-sensation equal to the preoperative state.

[CONCLUSION] Current evidence indicates that the EP technique should be the preferred surgical method to treat gigantomastia with or without massive ptosis whenever indicated. It has proven to be safe. Furthermore, it yields superior aesthetic and functional outcomes, including breast feeding and preservation of NAC-sensation compared to the LP technique.