본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Should Cosmetic Outcome Influence Discussions about Goals of Care for Severely Burned Patients?

AMA journal of ethics 2018 Vol.20(1) p. 546-551

Liu YM, Romanowski KS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 중증 화상 환자에서 잠재적 대리 결정자가 환자의 의사와 상충되는 미용적 결과(cosmesis)를 주장할 때, 대리 결정자의 선택과 역할에 관한 윤리적 원칙을 고찰한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liu YM, Romanowski KS (2018). Should Cosmetic Outcome Influence Discussions about Goals of Care for Severely Burned Patients?. AMA journal of ethics, 20(1), 546-551. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.6.cscm3-1806
MLA Liu YM, et al.. "Should Cosmetic Outcome Influence Discussions about Goals of Care for Severely Burned Patients?." AMA journal of ethics, vol. 20, no. 1, 2018, pp. 546-551.
PMID 29905132

Abstract

We focus on surrogate decision making and, specifically, the topic of cosmetic outcomes following burn injury in a case in which potential surrogates dispute what the patient would have wanted. In particular, we examine the choice and role of surrogate decision makers in light of ethical principles that guide surrogate decision making. We also examine whether and when cosmesis should enter into goals of care discussions and consider potential roles cosmetic outcomes could play in such discussions. Finally, we discuss how caregivers should respond when surrogate decision makers suggest cosmetic results as a reason for withdrawing care.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
합병증 Care scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Burns; Communication; Decision Making; Deep Sedation; Delivery of Health Care; Esthetics; Ethics, Medical; Goals; Humans; Informed Consent; Mental Competency; Proxy; Severity of Illness Index; Surgery, Plastic; Treatment Outcome; Withholding Treatment

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)