Cleft lip nose correction combining open rhinoplasty with the Dibbel technique.
Abstract
Cleft lip nose rhinoplasty is a challenging procedure because of the different presentation and severity of the deformity. Due to this presentation type, there is still no standard procedure correcting all the components of the deformity although a number of techniques have been published in literature. In this study, the effectiveness of the combination of open rhinoplasty and the Dibbel technique with nasal sill augmentation was evaluated. We hereby report our experience with 7 patients who had unilateral cleft lip nose deformity with slumped lower lateral cartilage and underprojected and deformed dome, operated on between September 2010 and April 2013 by 1 surgeon. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 24.5 years (18-38 years) and the patients were followed up for an average of 18.5 months (6-31 months). All patients were operated on with open rhinoplasty and Dibbel technique combination with nasal sill augmentation. Frontal, lateral, oblique, and basilar photographs were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively for each patient. Nasal projection, columella height, nasolabial angle, nasal sill symmetry, and base width were measured on the photographs for comparison of preoperative and postoperative results. All patients' medial and lateral cantus distances were used for photographic standardization. The results demonstrated that there was a statistically significant increase in nasal projection (2.13 ± 0.28 mm preoperatively versus 2.31 ± 0.08 mm postoperatively; P = 0.018), columella height (1.07 ± 0.25 mm preoperatively versus 1.21 ± 0.18 mm postoperatively; P = 0.028), nostril apex height (1.11 ± 0.15 mm preoperatively versus 1.22 ± 0.11 mm postoperatively, P < 0.028), nasolabial angle (77.71 ± 8.74 mm preoperatively versus 91.33 ± 6.49 mm postoperatively; P < 0.05), and nasal sill symmetry (0.42 ± 0.15 mm preoperatively versus 0.27 ± 0.07 mm postoperatively; P < 0.05), and a significant decrease of alar width (2.35 ± 0.44 mm versus 2.16 ± 0.32 mm postoperatively; P = 0.018) on the affected side in response to surgery. The results of this study demonstrated that the Dibbel technique and open rhinoplasty combination with nasal sill augmentation is an effective and safe method for the correction of cleft lip nose deformity in respect to nasal symmetry.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 5 | |
| 기법 | open rhinoplasty
|
개방형 접근법 | dict | 4 | |
| 해부 | lateral
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | basilar
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | Nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | columella
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | medial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | lip nose
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | nostril
|
콧방울 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | alar
|
콧방울 | dict | 1 | |
| 합병증 | nasal sill
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasolabial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nostril apex
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | Cleft lip nose
|
C4759655
Congenital cleft nose
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | Cleft lip nose rhinoplasty
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | cleft lip nose deformity
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patients
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | patient
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | lateral cantus distances
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Female; Humans; Male; Nasal Septum; Nose; Nose Diseases; Postoperative Period; Rhinoplasty; Treatment Outcome
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.