본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Various Rhinoplasty Techniques and Long-Term Results.

2/5 보강
Aesthetic plastic surgery 📖 저널 OA 9.3% 2021: 18/246 OA 2022: 23/293 OA 2023: 49/237 OA 2024: 81/351 OA 2025: 78/504 OA 2026: 58/331 OA 2021~2026 2015 Vol.39(4) p. 465-73
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1526 patients, 1131 were operated on with open rhinoplasty with transcolumellar incision, 219 were operated on with ORWTI, and 176 were operated on using the endonasal approach.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
nasal surgery utilizing one of these three techniques between 1999 and 2013 and discuss some modifications to the techniques
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
With open rhinoplasty with the transcolumellar incision technique, the type of surgery can be more easily controlled, however, extended nasal tip edema and columellar scar are some of the disadvantages of this method. ORWTI allows a patient to avoid these disadvantages and provides a more controlled procedure, similar to the open method.

Ors S, Ozkose M, Ors S

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 44.0%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

관련 도메인

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 코성형술(rhinoplasty)에서 널리 사용되는 개방형 접근법(open approach), 내비강 접근법(endonasal approach), 그리고 절개선 없이 개방형 접근의 장점을 결합한 개방형 코성형술 무중격피판 절개(ORWTI) 기법 간의 비교 분석을 통해 각 기법의 임상적 효용성과 장기적 결과를 평가한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ors S, Ozkose M, Ors S (2015). Comparison of Various Rhinoplasty Techniques and Long-Term Results.. Aesthetic plastic surgery, 39(4), 465-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0497-5
MLA Ors S, et al.. "Comparison of Various Rhinoplasty Techniques and Long-Term Results.." Aesthetic plastic surgery, vol. 39, no. 4, 2015, pp. 465-73.
PMID 25948068 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Various techniques are used in rhinoplasty. These techniques can be classified under transcolumellar approaches and endonasal procedures. Open rhinoplasty without transcolumellar incision (ORWTI) procedure can be described as a combination of these two techniques.

[METHODS] In this study, we present patients who underwent nasal surgery utilizing one of these three techniques between 1999 and 2013 and discuss some modifications to the techniques.

[RESULTS] Of a total of 1526 patients, 1131 were operated on with open rhinoplasty with transcolumellar incision, 219 were operated on with ORWTI, and 176 were operated on using the endonasal approach. With an average follow-up period of approximately 4 years, 4 % of the patients required revision. The patient satisfaction rate was more than 90 % for all of these techniques.

[CONCLUSIONS] The endonasal approach is an appropriate choice for select patients due to the lower chance of complications and a shorter procedure time. With open rhinoplasty with the transcolumellar incision technique, the type of surgery can be more easily controlled, however, extended nasal tip edema and columellar scar are some of the disadvantages of this method. ORWTI allows a patient to avoid these disadvantages and provides a more controlled procedure, similar to the open method.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

전체 NER 표 보기
유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
시술 rhinoplasty 코성형술 dict 5
기법 open rhinoplasty 개방형 접근법 dict 3
시술 nasal surgery 코성형술 dict 1
해부 nasal tip 코끝 dict 1
합병증 edema scispacy 1
합병증 columellar scar scispacy 1
약물 Long-Term scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] The scispacy 1
질환 edema C0013604
Edema
scispacy 1
기타 nasal scispacy 1

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

📖 비슷한 OA 논문 — 같은 카테고리, 무료 전문 가능