The Importance of Multiple, Different Rhinoplasty Consultations in Patient Selection.
[OBJECTIVE] We aimed to investigate the relationship between the number of visits to different physicians and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing primary septorhinoplasty by using the RO
- p-value p < 0.001
APA
Erkan ZA, Erkan SO (2019). The Importance of Multiple, Different Rhinoplasty Consultations in Patient Selection.. Aesthetic plastic surgery, 43(6), 1595-1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01403-8
MLA
Erkan ZA, et al.. "The Importance of Multiple, Different Rhinoplasty Consultations in Patient Selection.." Aesthetic plastic surgery, vol. 43, no. 6, 2019, pp. 1595-1600.
PMID
31139911
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] We aimed to investigate the relationship between the number of visits to different physicians and postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing primary septorhinoplasty by using the ROE survey.
[METHODS] Patients for whom we performed septorhinoplasty in the last 3 years were examined. Patients who visited 3 different physicians (including us) before the surgery were allocated to group 1. Patients who visited ≥ 4 physicians comprised group 2. We randomized 50 patients in each group. Rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) was performed twice for the preoperative evaluation and to determine the satisfaction in postoperative 6th month.
[RESULTS] Preoperative and postoperative ROE values were significantly lower in group 2 (p < 0.001). ROE values after surgery were 82% in group 1 and 68.92% in group 2.
[CONCLUSION] We think that it is more appropriate for patients who visit many surgeons to be evaluated more carefully and to be psychologically examined.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
[METHODS] Patients for whom we performed septorhinoplasty in the last 3 years were examined. Patients who visited 3 different physicians (including us) before the surgery were allocated to group 1. Patients who visited ≥ 4 physicians comprised group 2. We randomized 50 patients in each group. Rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) was performed twice for the preoperative evaluation and to determine the satisfaction in postoperative 6th month.
[RESULTS] Preoperative and postoperative ROE values were significantly lower in group 2 (p < 0.001). ROE values after surgery were 82% in group 1 and 68.92% in group 2.
[CONCLUSION] We think that it is more appropriate for patients who visit many surgeons to be evaluated more carefully and to be psychologically examined.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 2 | |
| 시술 | septorhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 2 |
MeSH Terms
Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Patient Selection; Referral and Consultation; Retrospective Studies; Rhinoplasty; Young Adult
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.