Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.
【연구 목적】 본 연구는 의료적 치료에 대한 동의의 법적 한계를 재확인하고, 특히 미용 시술 분야에서 환자의 동의가 법적 면책 사유가 될 수 있는 범위를 명확히 하는 것을 목적으로 한다.
APA
Holden ACL, Stewart C (2019). Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.. Internal medicine journal, 49(8), 1022-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14387
MLA
Holden ACL, et al.. "Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.." Internal medicine journal, vol. 49, no. 8, 2019, pp. 1022-1025.
PMID
31387139
Abstract
This update restates the legal limits of consent to medical treatment. It reviews the classic statement of law set down by the case of R v Brown, where 'proper medical treatment' was stated to be exempted from the ordinary laws of consent. This position has been recently developed further by the 2018 English case of R v BM where a non-medical body modification artist was convicted for having carried out substantive body modification procedures. This article considers how these developments may affect Australian law, particularly laws pertaining to cosmetic procedures.
MeSH Terms
Australia; Humans; Informed Consent; Liability, Legal; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgery, Plastic