본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.

Internal medicine journal 2019 Vol.49(8) p. 1022-1025

Holden ACL, Stewart C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 본 연구는 의료적 치료에 대한 동의의 법적 한계를 재확인하고, 특히 미용 시술 분야에서 환자의 동의가 법적 면책 사유가 될 수 있는 범위를 명확히 하는 것을 목적으로 한다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Holden ACL, Stewart C (2019). Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.. Internal medicine journal, 49(8), 1022-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14387
MLA Holden ACL, et al.. "Limits to consent in cosmetic interventions: an update.." Internal medicine journal, vol. 49, no. 8, 2019, pp. 1022-1025.
PMID 31387139
DOI 10.1111/imj.14387

Abstract

This update restates the legal limits of consent to medical treatment. It reviews the classic statement of law set down by the case of R v Brown, where 'proper medical treatment' was stated to be exempted from the ordinary laws of consent. This position has been recently developed further by the 2018 English case of R v BM where a non-medical body modification artist was convicted for having carried out substantive body modification procedures. This article considers how these developments may affect Australian law, particularly laws pertaining to cosmetic procedures.

MeSH Terms

Australia; Humans; Informed Consent; Liability, Legal; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surgery, Plastic