Nasal axis lateralization suture technique in crooked nose.
Abstract
[PURPOSE] The aim of the present study was to objectively and subjectively compare the preoperative and postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes of the correction of crooked noses using a suture technique we call "nasal axis lateralization suture (NALS)".
[METHOD] A total of 36 patients who had preoperative and postoperative photographs taken and who completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were included in the study.
[RESULTS] Crooked noses were divided into two groups: C-shaped (17 patients) and I-shaped (19 patients). The preoperative and postoperative nasal axis angles were 145.3 ± 11.9 and 178.5 ± 3.3, respectively, in C-shaped nasal deviation. In I-shaped nasal deviation, on the other hand, the preoperative nasal axis angle was 8.8 ± 2.8, while the postoperative nasal axis angle was 1.4 ± 2.4. In terms of the ideal axis percentage before and after surgery, a significant difference was found between the C-shaped and I-shaped nasal deviation patient groups (p < 0.05). While there was a significant improvement in both groups in the evaluation based on the ROE questionnaire, satisfaction was much higher in the C-shaped nasal deviation group. In both groups, the ROE values of functional and aesthetic outcomes were significantly different compared to the preoperative values of both groups (p < 0.005).
[CONCLUSION] NALS can be used as an alternative technique to correct both I-shaped and C-shaped nasal axis deviations.
[METHOD] A total of 36 patients who had preoperative and postoperative photographs taken and who completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were included in the study.
[RESULTS] Crooked noses were divided into two groups: C-shaped (17 patients) and I-shaped (19 patients). The preoperative and postoperative nasal axis angles were 145.3 ± 11.9 and 178.5 ± 3.3, respectively, in C-shaped nasal deviation. In I-shaped nasal deviation, on the other hand, the preoperative nasal axis angle was 8.8 ± 2.8, while the postoperative nasal axis angle was 1.4 ± 2.4. In terms of the ideal axis percentage before and after surgery, a significant difference was found between the C-shaped and I-shaped nasal deviation patient groups (p < 0.05). While there was a significant improvement in both groups in the evaluation based on the ROE questionnaire, satisfaction was much higher in the C-shaped nasal deviation group. In both groups, the ROE values of functional and aesthetic outcomes were significantly different compared to the preoperative values of both groups (p < 0.005).
[CONCLUSION] NALS can be used as an alternative technique to correct both I-shaped and C-shaped nasal axis deviations.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | Nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | ± 2.4
|
C4517631
2.4
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 질환 | crooked nose
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | crooked noses
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Rhinoplasty; Suture Techniques; Female; Male; Adult; Esthetics; Nose Deformities, Acquired; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Adolescent; Surveys and Questionnaires; Nose
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.