Regional Variations in Nasal Parameters in South India: A Descriptive Study.
TL;DR
The findings of this study will serve as a foundation for rhinoplasty procedures performed on the South Indian population as currently there is a lack of literature in this area of study.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
The findings of this study will serve as a foundation for rhinoplasty procedures performed on the South Indian population as currently there is a lack of literature in this area of study.
APA
J. Devika, Joyce Sequeira (2024). Regional Variations in Nasal Parameters in South India: A Descriptive Study.. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 23(6), 1349-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02314-1
MLA
J. Devika, et al.. "Regional Variations in Nasal Parameters in South India: A Descriptive Study.." Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, vol. 23, no. 6, 2024, pp. 1349-1354.
PMID
39618442
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] This paper aims to evaluate and standardize measurements of 11 nasal parameters specific to the South Indian population. This is significant because different ethnicities exhibit varying nasal proportions. The findings of this study will serve as a foundation for rhinoplasty procedures performed on the South Indian population as currently there is a lack of literature in this area of study.
[METHODOLOGY] A total of 136 young individuals of age group 18-30 were taken as a sample; 34 from each state that is Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh were taken up for the study. Standardized photographs of the nose were taken. Eleven nasal parameters were measured using Digimiser software and analyzed.
[RESULTS] Eight out of eleven parameters have statistically significant differences among the population of all four South Indian states, while three parameters did not have much of a statistically significant difference.
[CONCLUSION] When compared to the standard values of nasal parameters of the Indian population, only radix height and nasolabial angle were similar. The nasal index of all four South Indian ethnicities was platyrrhine. The nasal parameters did not differ among males and females in all the four South Indian populations.
[METHODOLOGY] A total of 136 young individuals of age group 18-30 were taken as a sample; 34 from each state that is Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Andhra Pradesh were taken up for the study. Standardized photographs of the nose were taken. Eleven nasal parameters were measured using Digimiser software and analyzed.
[RESULTS] Eight out of eleven parameters have statistically significant differences among the population of all four South Indian states, while three parameters did not have much of a statistically significant difference.
[CONCLUSION] When compared to the standard values of nasal parameters of the Indian population, only radix height and nasolabial angle were similar. The nasal index of all four South Indian ethnicities was platyrrhine. The nasal parameters did not differ among males and females in all the four South Indian populations.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 해부 | nose
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | Nasal Parameters
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasolabial
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | nasal index
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | nasal
|
scispacy | 1 |
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.