Quality and Reliability of 2D and 3D Clinical Photographs in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Aesthetic plastic surgery 2025 Vol.49(15) p. 4447-4457

Tian WM, Porras Fimbres DC, Tran MM, Zeng SL, Gnaedinger AG, Kaplan S, Marcus JR, Patel A

관련 도메인

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Clinical photography is a critical tool in plastic surgery practice. The primary aim of this scoping review was to assess the quality and reliability of various 2D and 3D photography modalities in plastic surgery.

[METHODS] The databases, MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase via Elsevier, and Scopus via Elsevier, were searched from inception to March 15, 2023, for any papers focused on evaluation of quality and/or reliability of photography in plastic surgery-related applications. Data regarding general article characteristics, study characteristics, participants, and study results were extracted by two reviewers and qualitatively synthesized.

[RESULTS] A total of 17 studies published from 1999 to 2023 were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. Thirteen (76.5%) were cross-sectional and four (23.5%) were cohort studies. Photographed locations included craniomaxillofacial and oral (n = 11, 64.7%), scars (n = 3, 17.6%), breast and torso (n = 2, 11.8%), and wounds (n = 1, 5.9%). Assessed photographic modalities were found to be on par or better than comparators in almost all applicable cases (n = 13/14, 92.9%).

[CONCLUSIONS] Multiple photographic modalities were found to have adequate quality and reliability. 3D photography was found to be a superior imaging modality for craniomaxillofacial and oral applications. For scar and wound assessment and images of the breast and torso region, 2D photography was sufficient. Overall, 2D photography using smartphone devices is sufficient for reliable and quality images in most clinical settings. With continued advances in technology, the ability to capture clinical images will undoubtedly improve, and there is a need for future studies to assess and compare these modalities.

[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 breast 유방 dict 2
해부 oral scispacy 1
합병증 wounds scispacy 1
합병증 scar scispacy 1
합병증 wound scispacy 1
약물 [BACKGROUND] scispacy 1
약물 [RESULTS] A scispacy 1
약물 [CONCLUSIONS] Multiple scispacy 1
질환 craniomaxillofacial scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Photography; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Reproducibility of Results; Surgery, Plastic

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문