Predictors of Match Success for Reapplicants in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Insights From Program Directors.
TL;DR
While stigma exists, most PRS programs still consider reapplicants and the most recommended pathway for reapplicants was a preliminary surgical internship, followed by a research fellowship, followed by a preliminary surgical internship and research fellowship.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Medical Education and Admissions
Healthcare Systems and Challenges
APA
Christian X. Lava, Peaches A. Dozier, Stephen B. Baker (2025). Predictors of Match Success for Reapplicants in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Insights From Program Directors.. Journal of surgical education, 82(11), 103700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103700
MLA
Christian X. Lava, et al.. "Predictors of Match Success for Reapplicants in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Insights From Program Directors.." Journal of surgical education, vol. 82, no. 11, 2025, pp. 103700.
PMID
40961837
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] Plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is among the most competitive specialties, with up to 45% going unmatched each year. While extensive research exists on first-time PRS applicants, data on reapplicants remain limited. This study examines PRS Program Directors' (PDs) perceptions of reapplicants, preferred pathways, and key factors influencing reapplication success.
[DESIGN] The 12-item survey included questions regarding perceived stigma toward reapplicants, recommended reapplication strategies, and barriers to matching.
[SETTING] Multi-institutional PARTICIPANTS: The survey was distributed via email to PRS PDs through American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons from November 2024 to February 2025.
[RESULTS] Twenty-five (28.5%) PDs completed the survey. Of these, 21 (84.0%) acknowledged stigma toward reapplicants, while 20 (80.0%) reported offering interviews at least "sometimes." PDs who recognized stigma were not significantly more likely to offer interviews than those who did not (45.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.593). The most favored pathways were a preliminary surgical internship (n = 17, 54%) and research fellowship (n = 11, 22%). Key factors for reapplicant success included excelling in clinical rotations (n = 11, 22.0%), conducting new research (n = 9, 18.0%), and rotating in the target department (n = 7, 14.0%). The greatest barriers were lack of resume improvement (n = 11, 22.0%), poor interview performance (n = 8, 16.0%), and weak letters of recommendation (n = 8, 16.0%).
[CONCLUSION] While stigma exists, most PRS programs still consider reapplicants. The most recommended pathway for reapplicants was a preliminary surgical internship, followed by a research fellowship. Additionally, PDs emphasized clinical excellence, research productivity, and mentorship as key factors for success. Ultimately, reapplicants must take a critical, personalized approach to their deficiencies.
[DESIGN] The 12-item survey included questions regarding perceived stigma toward reapplicants, recommended reapplication strategies, and barriers to matching.
[SETTING] Multi-institutional PARTICIPANTS: The survey was distributed via email to PRS PDs through American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons from November 2024 to February 2025.
[RESULTS] Twenty-five (28.5%) PDs completed the survey. Of these, 21 (84.0%) acknowledged stigma toward reapplicants, while 20 (80.0%) reported offering interviews at least "sometimes." PDs who recognized stigma were not significantly more likely to offer interviews than those who did not (45.5% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.593). The most favored pathways were a preliminary surgical internship (n = 17, 54%) and research fellowship (n = 11, 22%). Key factors for reapplicant success included excelling in clinical rotations (n = 11, 22.0%), conducting new research (n = 9, 18.0%), and rotating in the target department (n = 7, 14.0%). The greatest barriers were lack of resume improvement (n = 11, 22.0%), poor interview performance (n = 8, 16.0%), and weak letters of recommendation (n = 8, 16.0%).
[CONCLUSION] While stigma exists, most PRS programs still consider reapplicants. The most recommended pathway for reapplicants was a preliminary surgical internship, followed by a research fellowship. Additionally, PDs emphasized clinical excellence, research productivity, and mentorship as key factors for success. Ultimately, reapplicants must take a critical, personalized approach to their deficiencies.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | PDs
→ Program Directors'
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 약물 | PRS
→ Plastic and reconstructive surgery
|
C4763957
Reconstructive Plastic Surgery
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [DESIGN] The
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | PRS
→ Plastic and reconstructive surgery
|
C4763957
Reconstructive Plastic Surgery
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Surgery, Plastic; Humans; Internship and Residency; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surveys and Questionnaires; Male; Female; United States; Education, Medical, Graduate; Personnel Selection; Adult
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
- Superolateral Pedicle Breast Reduction for Patients with Medially Positioned Nipple-Areola Complexes.
- The Role of Decision Aids and Soft Tissue Simulations in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Pilot Study.
- Factors Influencing Graduates of American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowships Career Choice of Academic or Private Practice: A 20-Year Review.