본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Myocarditis and Non-ICI Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.

1/5 보강
Journal of clinical medicine 📖 저널 OA 100% 2025 Vol.14(21)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
54 patients ( = 26 ICI myocarditis; = 28 non-ICI myocarditis) underwent clinical CMR for the assessment of cardiac function (cines), myocardial fibrosis (native T1-mapping, extracellular volume [ECV] fraction, late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) and myocardial oedema (native T2-mapping).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
non-ICI myocarditis. Further work is needed to assess the value of CMR for diagnosing standalone ICI myocarditis.

Jacobs E, Yip A, Hodge A, McLean D, Lee J, Parish V, Ellery S, Olsson-Brown A, Liu A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

: Differentiating between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis and non-ICI myocarditis is clinically important.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Jacobs E, Yip A, et al. (2025). Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Myocarditis and Non-ICI Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.. Journal of clinical medicine, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14217809
MLA Jacobs E, et al.. "Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Myocarditis and Non-ICI Myocarditis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Single-Centre Retrospective Observational Study.." Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 14, no. 21, 2025.
PMID 41227207
DOI 10.3390/jcm14217809

Abstract

: Differentiating between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis and non-ICI myocarditis is clinically important. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a well-established method for diagnosing acute myocarditis. The value of CMR for distinguishing ICI myocarditis from non-ICI myocarditis remains unclear, which this study sought to determine. : A total of 54 patients ( = 26 ICI myocarditis; = 28 non-ICI myocarditis) underwent clinical CMR for the assessment of cardiac function (cines), myocardial fibrosis (native T1-mapping, extracellular volume [ECV] fraction, late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) and myocardial oedema (native T2-mapping). : ICI myocarditis patients were older than non-ICI myocarditis patients (75 years [71-78] vs. 39 years [30-64]; < 0.001). Both groups had similar left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (58 ± 11% vs. 58 ± 6%; = 0.970). ICI myocarditis and non-ICI myocarditis patients also had similar native myocardial T1 values (1041 ± 84 ms vs. 1063 ± 60 ms; = 0.281), native myocardial T2 values (59 ± 6 ms vs. 59 ± 6 ms; = 0.943) and ECV (0.32 ± 0.07 vs. 0.31 ± 0.04; = 0.403). Native myocardial T1 values (Rho = -0.553) and ECV (Rho = -0.502) were significantly associated with LVEF in non-ICI myocarditis patients (both < 0.05). There was no significant association between myocardial T1 values, T2 values or ECV, with LVEF, in ICI myocarditis patients (all < 0.05). Non-ICI myocarditis patients had a greater frequency of LGE in the LV compared to ICI myocarditis patients (89% vs. 52% = 0.005). However, the pattern of LGE was similar between the two patient groups (mostly subepicardial and/or mid-wall). : In this single centre retrospective cohort, the findings suggest that quantitative parametric mapping methods by CMR may not differentiate between ICI vs. non-ICI myocarditis. Further work is needed to assess the value of CMR for diagnosing standalone ICI myocarditis.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🟢 PMC 전문 열기