본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Anti-EGFR enhanced neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

1/5 보강
Frontiers in immunology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 2/2 OA 2022: 13/13 OA 2023: 10/10 OA 2024: 62/62 OA 2025: 810/810 OA 2026: 522/522 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.16() p. 1669368
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
475 patients with stage III-IVA OSCC were stratified into three groups: NAIC (n=265), NAI-CTX (n=46), and NAC (n=164).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was primarily associated with PD-L1 expression levels rather than the number of treatment cycles. [CONCLUSION] NAIC demonstrates superior pathologic responses and survival benefits compared to both NAI-CTX and NAC, establishing it as a highly promising neoadjuvant strategy for locally advanced OSCC.

Li P, Jin Q, Su M, Fang Q, Du W

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but their efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting is still under investigation.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 265
  • p-value p<0.001
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Li P, Jin Q, et al. (2025). Anti-EGFR enhanced neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.. Frontiers in immunology, 16, 1669368. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1669368
MLA Li P, et al.. "Anti-EGFR enhanced neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.." Frontiers in immunology, vol. 16, 2025, pp. 1669368.
PMID 41357202 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but their efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting is still under investigation. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC), neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus cetuximab (NAI-CTX), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced OSCC.

[METHODS] In this retrospective cohort study, 475 patients with stage III-IVA OSCC were stratified into three groups: NAIC (n=265), NAI-CTX (n=46), and NAC (n=164). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), major pathologic response (mPR), and treatment-related toxicity.

[RESULTS] Pathologic outcomes were significantly superior in the NAIC group. The pCR rates were 30.2% for NAIC, compared to 13.0% for NAI-CTX and 7.3% for NAC (p<0.001). Similarly, mPR rates were 69.8%, 39.1%, and 50.0%, respectively (p<0.001). NAIC also achieved a higher objective response rate (90.6% 71.7% 65.9%, p<0.001) and a near-complete R0 resection rate (98.1% 89.1% 97.0%). Survival analysis revealed 3-year EFS rates of 73.6% (NAIC), 56.5% (NAI-CTX), and 46.3% (NAC) (p<0.0001), with corresponding 3-year OS rates of 78.1%, 63.0%, and 59.1% (p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent survival benefit of NAIC. Toxicity profiles differed: the NAI-CTX group exhibited more cetuximab-related toxicities, while NAIC was associated with a higher incidence of hypothyroidism. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy was primarily associated with PD-L1 expression levels rather than the number of treatment cycles.

[CONCLUSION] NAIC demonstrates superior pathologic responses and survival benefits compared to both NAI-CTX and NAC, establishing it as a highly promising neoadjuvant strategy for locally advanced OSCC.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

… 외 1개

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기