Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study.
코호트
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive. [SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3.
[BACKGROUND] Emerging evidence indicates that estrogen receptor-low (ER-low)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) may more closely resemble ER-negative (ER-zero
- 표본수 (n) 398
APA
Steen S, Karlsson E, et al. (2025). Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study.. Breast cancer research : BCR, 27(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3
MLA
Steen S, et al.. "Pathological response to pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER-low vs. ER-zero breast cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study.." Breast cancer research : BCR, vol. 27, no. 1, 2025, pp. 213.
PMID
41316480 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Emerging evidence indicates that estrogen receptor-low (ER-low)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) may more closely resemble ER-negative (ER-zero, < 1%) rather than ER-positive disease in terms of biological and clinicopathological characteristics. In Sweden, ER-low (ER 1–9%) BC is managed as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and is thus eligible for neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. We aimed to investigate real-world pathological response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in ER-low versus ER-zero BC patients within a Swedish population-based multi-center cohort.
[METHODS] BC patients with indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data—including pathological complete response (pCR) status, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) levels, and routine tumor characteristics—were retrieved from laboratory information systems. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared (χ) tests and associations between continuous variables and ER status or pCR were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test.
[RESULTS] The total cohort comprised 441 TNBC cases (ER-zero n = 398; ER-low n = 43). In the ER-zero group, the pCR rate and RCB score 0–1 were 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5% to 55.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 55.8% to 65.6%), respectively. In the ER-low group, the corresponding values were 58.1% (95% CI: 42.1% to 73%), and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4% to 75%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either pCR rate ( = 0.46) or dichotomized RCB score ( = 0.88) between the groups. The ER-low group showed significantly higher sTILs percentage compared to the ER-zero group (median sTILs 25% versus 20%, = 0.046). However, when sTILs were analyzed as a binary categorical variable using a 30% cut-off, no significant difference was observed ( = 0.33).
[CONCLUSIONS] We observed no significant difference in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab between ER-zero and ER-low BCs. These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive.
[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3.
[METHODS] BC patients with indication to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in Sweden between 2022 and 2024 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data—including pathological complete response (pCR) status, residual cancer burden (RCB) score, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) levels, and routine tumor characteristics—were retrieved from laboratory information systems. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-squared (χ) tests and associations between continuous variables and ER status or pCR were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U-test.
[RESULTS] The total cohort comprised 441 TNBC cases (ER-zero n = 398; ER-low n = 43). In the ER-zero group, the pCR rate and RCB score 0–1 were 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5% to 55.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 55.8% to 65.6%), respectively. In the ER-low group, the corresponding values were 58.1% (95% CI: 42.1% to 73%), and 60.5% (95% CI: 44.4% to 75%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in either pCR rate ( = 0.46) or dichotomized RCB score ( = 0.88) between the groups. The ER-low group showed significantly higher sTILs percentage compared to the ER-zero group (median sTILs 25% versus 20%, = 0.046). However, when sTILs were analyzed as a binary categorical variable using a 30% cut-off, no significant difference was observed ( = 0.33).
[CONCLUSIONS] We observed no significant difference in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab between ER-zero and ER-low BCs. These findings support previous evidence suggesting that ER-low tumors behave more similarly to ER-zero than ER-positive.
[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-025-02179-3.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Association of immune-related adverse events with survival in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for lung cancer.
- Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a head-to-head trial vs. real-world comparison.
- Real-world data on anti-PD-1 plus lenvatinib as a treatment option in pretreated advanced melanoma patients - a retrospective DeCOG study.
- Neoadjuvant Therapy in Cisplatin-Ineligible Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Era of TAR-200 and Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab.
- Phase II randomized study of first-line carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with pembrolizumab, followed by maintenance pembrolizumab alone or with nesuparib, in mismatch-repair proficient, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (PENELOPE).
- A subset of MMR-proficient colon cancers responds to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.