Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of and sequential analysis of trials.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC)
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] This meta-analysis demonstrates that targeted and immune therapy significantly improves survival outcomes and overall response in patients with advanced or metastatic BTC. Considering the potential limitations, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cance
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Mao T, Li X, et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of and sequential analysis of trials.. Hepatology international, 19(6), 1412-1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10860-0
MLA
Mao T, et al.. "Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of and sequential analysis of trials.." Hepatology international, vol. 19, no. 6, 2025, pp. 1412-1427.
PMID
40760243 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC).
[METHODS] A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through October 2024. The outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to quantify each outcome.
[RESULTS] Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses revealed that targeted and immune therapy significantly improved OS and PFS compared to control. Subgroup analyses identified significant OS benefits with PD-L1 inhibitors, IDH1 inhibitors, and PD-1 inhibitors. In contrast, anti-EGFR agents, MET inhibitors, and anti-VEGF agents did not significantly prolong OS. PFS was improved with IDH1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors, and PD-1 inhibitors, while anti-VEGF agents showed no significant PFS benefit. Targeted and immune therapy significantly improved ORR and DCR, as confirmed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Incidences of all-grade, serious, and grade 3/4 AEs were comparable between the targeted and immune therapy and control groups. Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant influence of sample size, treatment duration, or publication year on OS and PFS outcomes.
[CONCLUSION] This meta-analysis demonstrates that targeted and immune therapy significantly improves survival outcomes and overall response in patients with advanced or metastatic BTC. Considering the potential limitations, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.
[METHODS] A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases through October 2024. The outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to quantify each outcome.
[RESULTS] Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses revealed that targeted and immune therapy significantly improved OS and PFS compared to control. Subgroup analyses identified significant OS benefits with PD-L1 inhibitors, IDH1 inhibitors, and PD-1 inhibitors. In contrast, anti-EGFR agents, MET inhibitors, and anti-VEGF agents did not significantly prolong OS. PFS was improved with IDH1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors, and PD-1 inhibitors, while anti-VEGF agents showed no significant PFS benefit. Targeted and immune therapy significantly improved ORR and DCR, as confirmed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). Incidences of all-grade, serious, and grade 3/4 AEs were comparable between the targeted and immune therapy and control groups. Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant influence of sample size, treatment duration, or publication year on OS and PFS outcomes.
[CONCLUSION] This meta-analysis demonstrates that targeted and immune therapy significantly improves survival outcomes and overall response in patients with advanced or metastatic BTC. Considering the potential limitations, further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.