본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Safety and efficacy of tiragolumab, atezolizumab and chemotherapy for early-stage or PD-L1-positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a phase Ib study.

1/5 보강
ESMO open 📖 저널 OA 100% 2022: 2/2 OA 2023: 3/3 OA 2024: 7/7 OA 2025: 50/50 OA 2026: 79/79 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.10(12) p. 105869
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
83 patients were enrolled from 24 sites in eight countries.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
first-line tiragolumab with atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The safety profile of all three regimens was consistent with previous experience of similar regimens in other tumour types and with symptoms of the underlying disease. [CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04584112.

Kuemmel S, Jung KH, Andrade L, Assad-Suzuki D, de la Cruz Merino L, Freitas-Junior R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but outcomes could be improved further.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 41
  • 95% CI 4.9-13.1

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Kuemmel S, Jung KH, et al. (2025). Safety and efficacy of tiragolumab, atezolizumab and chemotherapy for early-stage or PD-L1-positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a phase Ib study.. ESMO open, 10(12), 105869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105869
MLA Kuemmel S, et al.. "Safety and efficacy of tiragolumab, atezolizumab and chemotherapy for early-stage or PD-L1-positive advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a phase Ib study.." ESMO open, vol. 10, no. 12, 2025, pp. 105869.
PMID 41297162 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but outcomes could be improved further. We explored combining the T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) inhibitor tiragolumab with atezolizumab-containing regimens for patients with early-stage or advanced TNBC.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] This multinational open-label phase Ib study included two cohorts. In cohort A [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced TNBC], patients received first-line tiragolumab with atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate. In cohort B (early-stage TNBC, irrespective of PD-L1 status), patients were randomised to receive tiragolumab, atezolizumab and sequential taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy with (arm A) or without (arm B) carboplatin. The primary objective was to evaluate safety in arm A versus arm B.

[RESULTS] Between September 2020 and October 2021, 83 patients were enrolled from 24 sites in eight countries. In cohort A (n = 41), the confirmed objective response rate was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 69%], median duration of response in 22 responding patients was 7.2 months (95% CI 4.9-13.1 months), median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.4-9.0 months) and median overall survival was 24.6 months (95% CI 14.7 months-not estimable). Five patients (12%) discontinued tiragolumab for adverse events. In cohort B (n = 42), carboplatin was associated with more haematological effects but no increase in pathologic complete response rate [arm A: 46% (95% CI 24% to 68%); arm B: 55% (95% CI 32% to 77%)]. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 23% and 20% of patients in arms A and B, respectively.

[CONCLUSIONS] The activity of tiragolumab-containing regimens appeared similar to that of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in randomised phase III trials in early-stage and advanced TNBC. The safety profile of all three regimens was consistent with previous experience of similar regimens in other tumour types and with symptoms of the underlying disease.

[CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04584112.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기