본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

1/5 보강
Cureus 📖 저널 OA 99.9% 2021: 42/43 OA 2022: 79/79 OA 2023: 181/181 OA 2024: 284/284 OA 2025: 774/774 OA 2026: 506/506 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.17(12) p. e99211
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: adverse pathological features
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Overall, adjuvant pembrolizumab is practice-changing for high-risk clear-cell RCC, while neoadjuvant and perioperative approaches remain investigational. Advancing the field will require biomarker‑driven patient selection supported by adaptive or platform trial designs capable of rapidly evaluating multiple strategies.

Pereira J, Pereira-Lourenço M, Ferreira AM, Marques R, Godinho R, Peralta JP

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carries a substantial risk of recurrence after nephrectomy, particularly in patients with adverse pathological features.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Pereira J, Pereira-Lourenço M, et al. (2025). Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.. Cureus, 17(12), e99211. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.99211
MLA Pereira J, et al.. "Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Directions.." Cureus, vol. 17, no. 12, 2025, pp. e99211.
PMID 41536399 ↗

Abstract

Localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carries a substantial risk of recurrence after nephrectomy, particularly in patients with adverse pathological features. Perioperative systemic therapy aims to eradicate micrometastatic disease. This review summarizes current evidence for neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative strategies in localized RCC, and outlines how emerging biological insights may reshape trial design and clinical practice. We conducted a narrative, non-systematic review of phase II-III studies and conference presentations through August 2025, examining trials that reported disease-free or recurrence-free and overall survival, perioperative feasibility, and translational endpoints, with data cross-checked against full texts and meeting abstracts. Adjuvant pembrolizumab improves disease-free and overall survival in selected high‑risk clear‑cell RCC and is now standard of care, whereas results from vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mTOR inhibitors have been inconsistent across trials, with most studies failing to demonstrate a survival benefit. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), TKI, and immuno-oncology-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) regimens are feasible and generally safe without delaying surgery; radiographic shrinkage is modest, but clinically meaningful surgical facilitation has been observed, particularly in cases with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. To date, no randomized neoadjuvant trial has improved disease-free or overall survival, and the only completed phase III perioperative trial (PROSPER RCC) did not improve recurrence‑free survival, underscoring the need to better understand the optimal duration, timing, and patient selection for perioperative immunotherapy. Emerging biomarkers, including circulating KIM-1, ctDNA, and CD39 and TCF-1 CD8 states, may enable risk stratification and treatment tailoring but remain exploratory. Overall, adjuvant pembrolizumab is practice-changing for high-risk clear-cell RCC, while neoadjuvant and perioperative approaches remain investigational. Advancing the field will require biomarker‑driven patient selection supported by adaptive or platform trial designs capable of rapidly evaluating multiple strategies.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기