Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
[BACKGROUND] Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) provides sustained high intrahepatic drug exposure with limited systemic toxicity, potentially enhancing antigen release and immune sensitiza
- 표본수 (n) 32
- p-value P < 0.001
APA
Zhang Z, Wang M, et al. (2025). Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 75(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04255-1
MLA
Zhang Z, et al.. "Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.." Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, vol. 75, no. 1, 2025, pp. 15.
PMID
41417116
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) provides sustained high intrahepatic drug exposure with limited systemic toxicity, potentially enhancing antigen release and immune sensitization. This study compared the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy-based triple therapy in advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).
[METHODS] A retrospective analysis of 67 patients with unresectable iCCA treated with HAIC-based triple therapy (n = 32) or systemic triple therapy (n = 35) was conducted. Clinical efficacy, survival, prognostic factors and safety profiles were evaluated. Baseline imbalances were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses before and after IPTW assessed treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
[RESULTS] HAIC-based triple therapy achieved superior tumor control versus systemic therapy, with higher objective response rate (59.4 vs. 20.0%; P < 0.001), disease control rate (90.6 vs. 68.6%; P < 0.001), and tumor shrinkage (+ 6.5 vs. - 1.0 mm; P = 0.002). Local (93.8 vs. 66.7%; P = 0.006) and distant (90.3 vs. 72.7%; P = 0.071) control rates favored HAIC-based triple therapy. After IPTW adjustment, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that HAIC-based triple therapy significantly improved both OS (24.1 vs. 15.5 months; P = 0.010) and PFS (P = 0.020) compared to systemic therapy. In the IPTW-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, HAIC-based triple therapy was associated with a markedly reduced risk of OS (HR [95% CI]: 0.221[0.070-0.693]) and PFS (HR[95% CI]: 0.129[0.028-0.592]). Toxicities were manageable, and immune-related adverse events correlated with reduced progression.
[CONCLUSION] HAIC-based triple therapy provided superior tumor control, prolonged survival, and preserved hepatic function with acceptable safety in unresectable iCCA.
[METHODS] A retrospective analysis of 67 patients with unresectable iCCA treated with HAIC-based triple therapy (n = 32) or systemic triple therapy (n = 35) was conducted. Clinical efficacy, survival, prognostic factors and safety profiles were evaluated. Baseline imbalances were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses before and after IPTW assessed treatment effects on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
[RESULTS] HAIC-based triple therapy achieved superior tumor control versus systemic therapy, with higher objective response rate (59.4 vs. 20.0%; P < 0.001), disease control rate (90.6 vs. 68.6%; P < 0.001), and tumor shrinkage (+ 6.5 vs. - 1.0 mm; P = 0.002). Local (93.8 vs. 66.7%; P = 0.006) and distant (90.3 vs. 72.7%; P = 0.071) control rates favored HAIC-based triple therapy. After IPTW adjustment, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that HAIC-based triple therapy significantly improved both OS (24.1 vs. 15.5 months; P = 0.010) and PFS (P = 0.020) compared to systemic therapy. In the IPTW-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, HAIC-based triple therapy was associated with a markedly reduced risk of OS (HR [95% CI]: 0.221[0.070-0.693]) and PFS (HR[95% CI]: 0.129[0.028-0.592]). Toxicities were manageable, and immune-related adverse events correlated with reduced progression.
[CONCLUSION] HAIC-based triple therapy provided superior tumor control, prolonged survival, and preserved hepatic function with acceptable safety in unresectable iCCA.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Cholangiocarcinoma; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aged; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Quinolines; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Phenylurea Compounds; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen; Adult; Hepatic Artery
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Modified Use of Costal Cartilage in Asians for the Correction of Nostril Asymmetry in Unilateral Secondary Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.
- Unleashing CAR-T potential in solid tumors: overcoming intrinsic and extrinsic hurdles to improve therapy.
- Comparison of oncological outcomes between wedge resection and segmentectomy for T1a/bN0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
- Tumor-derived C4BPA promotes macrophage M2-like polarization through C5a -C5aR1-STAT3 axis and drives gastric cancer progression.
- Innate immunity in tumour immunoediting and immunosurveillance.