Rapid Assessment of Target-Binding Fractions in Theranostic and Imaging Agents Using Size-Exclusion HPLC.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
[CONCLUSIONS] SE-HPLC provides a rapid, specific, and cost-effective alternative to traditional binding fraction assessment methods, reducing quality control timelines from weeks/hours to minutes.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] SE-HPLC provides a rapid, specific, and cost-effective alternative to traditional binding fraction assessment methods, reducing quality control timelines from weeks/hours to minutes. The method's compatibility with both fluorescent and radiolabeled biologics and integration with existing HPLC infrastructure represents a significant advancement in development workflows.
[BACKGROUND] The clinical translation of molecularly targeted therapeutics and imaging agents represents a cornerstone of precision oncology, with the global theranostics market projected to exceed $2
APA
McAdoo A, Jouad K, et al. (2026). Rapid Assessment of Target-Binding Fractions in Theranostic and Imaging Agents Using Size-Exclusion HPLC.. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.23.699790
MLA
McAdoo A, et al.. "Rapid Assessment of Target-Binding Fractions in Theranostic and Imaging Agents Using Size-Exclusion HPLC.." bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026.
PMID
41648510 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] The clinical translation of molecularly targeted therapeutics and imaging agents represents a cornerstone of precision oncology, with the global theranostics market projected to exceed $25 billion by 2030. However, the development of theragnostic agents or diagnostic companions remains constrained by analytical bottlenecks in quality control, such as target-binding specificity, which are increasingly required by regulatory agencies as product release criteria during the translation process. Current methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which require specialized resources or external CROs, or bead-based assays for radiolabeled compounds, which involve complex multi-step protocols; these limitations and others hamper their practical implementation in clinical manufacturing environments. Assay delays can postpone clinical trial initiation, increase development costs, and delay patient access to these agents.
[RESULTS] We have developed and validated a rapid, size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) method for the determination of target-binding fractions of labeled biologics. The method separates the unbound biologic from the larger antigen-bound complex, allowing for rapid quantification. We validated the method using a panel of fluorescently labeled antibodies (panitumumab-IRDye800CW, nivolumab-IRDye800CW) and radiolabeled biologics ([18F]GEH200521, [18F]NOTA-ABY-030), assessing linearity, specificity, and concentration independence. The SE-HPLC method achieved excellent separation of bound and unbound species with a resolution (Rs) of 3.2. A strong linear relationship (R = 0.999) was observed between the antigen-to-antibody ratio and the measured binding fraction. The method demonstrated high specificity, with no binding detected with non-target antigens. The total assay and analysis time was less than 35 minutes, a significant improvement over traditional methods.
[CONCLUSIONS] SE-HPLC provides a rapid, specific, and cost-effective alternative to traditional binding fraction assessment methods, reducing quality control timelines from weeks/hours to minutes. The method's compatibility with both fluorescent and radiolabeled biologics and integration with existing HPLC infrastructure represents a significant advancement in development workflows.
[RESULTS] We have developed and validated a rapid, size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) method for the determination of target-binding fractions of labeled biologics. The method separates the unbound biologic from the larger antigen-bound complex, allowing for rapid quantification. We validated the method using a panel of fluorescently labeled antibodies (panitumumab-IRDye800CW, nivolumab-IRDye800CW) and radiolabeled biologics ([18F]GEH200521, [18F]NOTA-ABY-030), assessing linearity, specificity, and concentration independence. The SE-HPLC method achieved excellent separation of bound and unbound species with a resolution (Rs) of 3.2. A strong linear relationship (R = 0.999) was observed between the antigen-to-antibody ratio and the measured binding fraction. The method demonstrated high specificity, with no binding detected with non-target antigens. The total assay and analysis time was less than 35 minutes, a significant improvement over traditional methods.
[CONCLUSIONS] SE-HPLC provides a rapid, specific, and cost-effective alternative to traditional binding fraction assessment methods, reducing quality control timelines from weeks/hours to minutes. The method's compatibility with both fluorescent and radiolabeled biologics and integration with existing HPLC infrastructure represents a significant advancement in development workflows.