본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Clinical Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors as Standard First-Line Treatment in Low PD-L1-Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
MedComm 📖 저널 OA 100% 2024: 4/4 OA 2025: 49/49 OA 2026: 35/35 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.7(2) p. e70624 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
060 patients were enrolled.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Patient-level data indicate that ESCCs with TPS < 1% and HER2-negative GEAs with CPS < 5 do not benefit from the addition of ICIs to conventional chemotherapy. More nuanced clinical trials and predictive biomarkers are warranted.

Wu P, Gu X, Li D, Zi X, Shang D, Liu J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

This study aimed to assess the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression in advanced solid tumors.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • HR 0.82

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Wu P, Gu X, et al. (2026). Clinical Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors as Standard First-Line Treatment in Low PD-L1-Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. MedComm, 7(2), e70624. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70624
MLA Wu P, et al.. "Clinical Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors as Standard First-Line Treatment in Low PD-L1-Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.." MedComm, vol. 7, no. 2, 2026, pp. e70624.
PMID 41675360 ↗
DOI 10.1002/mco2.70624

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression in advanced solid tumors. The study included cancers approved by the FDA for first-line ICI therapy without PD-L1 restrictions, incorporating phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing immunotherapy with conventional care. Individual patient data of PD-L1 low subgroup were retrieved from Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves using IPDfromKM and KMSubtraction. Pooled analysis employed KM and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis to assess ICI benefit. Totally, 40 RCTs with 27,060 patients were enrolled. No survival benefit for low PD-L1 expression was observed in some cancers. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), combined positive score (CPS) < 10 had significant OS benefit (HR = 0.82, = 0.02; RMST-D = 2.34 months); tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1% showed no OS improvement (HR = 0.87, = 0.16, RMST-D = 1.71 months). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) had no OS benefit with CPS < 5, 1-4, and < 1, but significant benefits with CPS < 10 (HR = 0.87, = 0.048; RMST-D = 1.78 months, = 0.038) and CPS 1-9 (HR = 0.83, = 0.0085; RMST-D = 2.21 months, = 0.007). Patient-level data indicate that ESCCs with TPS < 1% and HER2-negative GEAs with CPS < 5 do not benefit from the addition of ICIs to conventional chemotherapy. More nuanced clinical trials and predictive biomarkers are warranted.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기