Impact of an Educational Campaign on Public Misconceptions and Knowledge of Common Plastic Surgery Procedures.
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] The demand for plastic surgery has increased as individuals seek appearance enhancement. However, common misconceptions persist, often exaggerating the risks associated with these procedures. Despite advancements in safety through improved techniques and post-operative care, public knowledge remains limited. This study aims to investigate prevalent misconceptions about common plastic surgery procedures to enhance understanding and support informed decision-making.
[METHOD] This cross-sectional study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, assessed public knowledge and misconceptions about common plastic surgery procedures through a self-administered survey distributed during an awareness campaign. A sample of 700 participants aged 18-50 was targeted, with responses collected pre- and post-campaign. A matching procedure controlled for demographic differences to ensure comparability between groups. The survey, developed in English and translated into Arabic, was pilot-tested for validity.
[RESULTS] Among 368 participants (184 pre and 184 post-campaign), demographic comparisons showed no significant differences between groups (e.g., gender, age, education, prior cosmetic surgery; all p > 0.05). Post-campaign, correct responses increased substantially: for fillers (irreversibility misconception dropped from 64.7 to 96.2%), silicone implants (safety concern reduced from 32.1 to 89.7%), and rhinoplasty (respiratory issues belief fell from 28.8 to 90.8%; all p < 0.001). Median knowledge scores rose from 7 to 19 (p < 0.001), with strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). Regression indicated reduced demographic disparities post-campaign, showing broad improvement across groups.
[CONCLUSION] The awareness campaign effectively improved public knowledge and corrected misconceptions about plastic surgery, reducing knowledge disparities across demographic groups. These findings highlight the impact of targeted educational interventions in promoting informed decision-making regarding cosmetic procedures.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
[METHOD] This cross-sectional study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, assessed public knowledge and misconceptions about common plastic surgery procedures through a self-administered survey distributed during an awareness campaign. A sample of 700 participants aged 18-50 was targeted, with responses collected pre- and post-campaign. A matching procedure controlled for demographic differences to ensure comparability between groups. The survey, developed in English and translated into Arabic, was pilot-tested for validity.
[RESULTS] Among 368 participants (184 pre and 184 post-campaign), demographic comparisons showed no significant differences between groups (e.g., gender, age, education, prior cosmetic surgery; all p > 0.05). Post-campaign, correct responses increased substantially: for fillers (irreversibility misconception dropped from 64.7 to 96.2%), silicone implants (safety concern reduced from 32.1 to 89.7%), and rhinoplasty (respiratory issues belief fell from 28.8 to 90.8%; all p < 0.001). Median knowledge scores rose from 7 to 19 (p < 0.001), with strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). Regression indicated reduced demographic disparities post-campaign, showing broad improvement across groups.
[CONCLUSION] The awareness campaign effectively improved public knowledge and corrected misconceptions about plastic surgery, reducing knowledge disparities across demographic groups. These findings highlight the impact of targeted educational interventions in promoting informed decision-making regarding cosmetic procedures.
[LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV] This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 시술 | rhinoplasty
|
코성형술 | dict | 1 | |
| 약물 | silicone
|
C0037114
silicones
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 약물 | [INTRODUCTION] The
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Male; Adult; Middle Aged; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Saudi Arabia; Young Adult; Adolescent; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Surveys and Questionnaires; Surgery, Plastic; Health Education
🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인
이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들
관련 논문
- The impact of three-dimensional simulation and virtual reality technologies on surgical decision-making and postoperative satisfaction in aesthetic surgery: a preliminary study.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.
- Septocolumellar strut technique: Tip stability and aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty.
- Implications of Dermatologic Disorders in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
- Factors on Quality of Life Improvement in Septorhinoplasty: Prospective Evaluation Using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 and Its Minimally Important Difference.